There has never been an objective thing in the world. When a person witnesses an event, it is no longer what the event itself looks like when he retells it. No matter how many words he uses or how many aspects he describes, since he is an individual, there are Judgment from your own experience - at this time, this matter is not what it is. Like MRX said, there is no such thing as a secure system. Nothing is objective enough. Everyone speaks with their own starting point, and even bystanders do not speak the same thing in exactly the same language. And after this kind of difference is enlarged once or twice, or even hundreds of times, it is very likely that it will become a different thing. What makes this film most "bright" is not only its content and what it makes people think about, but also the content arrangement and perspective change of the film. Let's start with the most basic point of view. Most of them are third-perspective, or God-perspective. We can see everything - characters, scenes and even bugs. But there are a few first perspectives - they are the most atmospheric. Several moments, including Benjamin's hallucinations caused by drugs and drinking, and escaping from the store, make people inexplicably enter some settings of the movie itself, and they will think, think and even guess the following. Then there is the content line of flashbacks and interludes. It's like the last few sentences in the "Small Revelation" section, "You have to let her piece together the information" "You have to say part of the information". The whole movie is like a worn-out film - only part of it you "see", and what you see - you're told - is one-sided, so every little twist is an unexpected surprise . You never know if what you "see" is true. People only believe what they want to believe because there are no facts, only themselves. But—who do you trust when you're not yourself? who I am? Everyone has great potential, no one else, this is your own path.
View more about Who Am I reviews
