On January x, 2017, 26-year-old U.S. netizen Vivian reposted photos of the gay parade on his Twitter homepage and wrote "support gays and anti-discrimination", thinking that he is a freedom fighter who stands on the front line of equal rights for marginalized groups . Is she a fighter? Yes. Is the crowd she supports marginal? In the network environment where Vivian is located, it's hard to tell. Because of the excessive care of marginalized people, shouting their names has become a mainstream trend, and talking about the mainstream group a little bit has become a controversial topic. The above are my thoughts on the selection tendency of the American Film Institute and the "comments" of Hollywood films [Ms. Sloan] in the past five years.
People who like this film may expose the fact that they lack a basic concept of politics and are keen on superficial drama and sexual stimulation. All viewers who have a clear concept of bipartisan politics believe that this film is not realistic in beautifying the white leftist and sensationalizing the crowd. Let me put it first. I don’t know anything about politics, and I am barely a fan of movies. I love this film very much, and I think it’s difficult to pick on the structure of the drama, and it’s better than many high-profile films this year. .
The mouse is short-sighted like me. Of course, I also know that the political environment presented in the film is extremely dramatic, and the actual politics is more cruel, but it will never be so "good-looking". Many people say that the screenwriter may be Sorkin’s stubborn fan. After reading this Sorkin’s stubborn fan, he stamped and verified the identity of the fellow. Non-linear narrative, quick cut, concentrated elite groups and mean sense of humor are indeed very Sorkin's flavor, and they are well controlled. Dramatic conflicts are intertwined, exciting, and full of surprises. You can say that the ending reversal after a series of surprises is no longer unexpected, but you can't say that you haven't been surprised the whole time. After I watched it out of the theater, I immediately bought a ticket and went in to watch it a second time. I paid more attention to details and techniques, and the foreshadowing and logic were perfect. As for the political tendencies criticized by many people, to be honest, as a passer-by who can't distinguish between the left and the right, I have never felt that the film is beautifying the faction. The film is a political theme, but to put it bluntly, it is just the personal biography of the heroine. I choose which side not because I believe in something, but because I like to win.
Speaking of the heroine, the performance of our lady Jessica Chastain is amazing. She is beautiful, wise, confident, firm, and at the same time showing her vulnerability and sensibility appropriately. In the film, the lines of the Fifth Amendment are repeated more than a dozen times, but at different stages, she shows subtle emotional changes. Although this is obviously a "script serves the role" type of work, she is well-deserved to be the leader and has achieved outstanding results. There are a lot of textbook-like "strong women" images in contemporary works, but the taste of being able to perform old characters on their own is not something that everyone can do. This controversial role cannot get an academy award, but it is the uncrowned king in my heart this year.
View more about Miss Sloane reviews
