This is a very gentlemanly bottom line. Without this bottom line, the performance will be smashed, the audience will be in chaos, the husband will run away, and the inheritance will be deceived...
So, is this bottom line realistic? I do not know. In that era and above that social class, under the protection of a certain amount of feelings, there may be.
However, is this bottom line hypocritical? Just like the story of the emperor's new clothes that we were taught since childhood, there must be a child who will jump out and expose it, but what happens after it is exposed? How do you know that the group of people will realize after the child speaks instead of frowning at the child "shhhhhh" and continuing to applaud? Of course, those people didn't continue to applaud, because the story explained from the beginning that he was a prodigal emperor who was exhausted and extravagant, while Aunt Mei played a big charitable little woman. Do you continue to applaud?
In fact, everyone has this bottom line in their hearts, and at the same time they often regard it as a legend, and now there is such a movie standing in front of this bottom line and praising it, and then some audiences can be firmer on the bottom line, and others. The audience continued to disagree, there's no harm in it anyway, isn't it?
View more about Florence Foster Jenkins reviews
