Skip the previous one, and only tell the story of the man and the daughter.
The man found out that his daughter who had been waiting for four years was not his kind. In the chaos, he knocked the old man unconscious, and the old man died of serious injuries. The man went out to get drunk, and the little girl went out to find someone to help the old man. Probably starved/cold to death.
At the end, the male police officer sets the time to 1,000/minute, and the female police officer agrees.
On the Internet, it is generally believed that men deserve what they deserve. There is currently no clear objection.
However, I don't think so......
---------
The male police punished the copy, which is obvious, because the man himself has no intersection with the "expert", and it is impossible to develop along the plot like that. This punishment is meaningless and has no effect on me.
That is to say, the male policeman is actually using the action of "punishing the copy" to vent his anger. The copy is just a carrier of the man's memory, and there is no crime in itself.
Then think about it, the "expert" just didn't call the police, and the result was judged by the judiciary as "blocked everyone". Feed yourself. It feels like the ending of "Expert" will be the same as that of the little girl.
From this analysis, we can see that the real object of irony is actually the judicial system . . . .
-------------
First of all, the irony is the "abuse of lynching" at the bottom of the judiciary. I am guilty of a crime and have not yet been tried. The copy has no crime, but is suffering. Alluding to the arbitrary bullying of suspects by the police system.
Second, the irony is the acquiescence of judicial middle-level supervision. If a police officer has any objection to a colleague’s behavior, he or she can give feedback to supervise, so the male police officer will only ask a question after modifying the time, and the female police officer said yes. It shows that the supervision itself does not have a fair view of the underlying behavior.
In the end, it is a satire on the arbitrary sentencing of the judicial high-level officials. The death of the little girl belongs to the side of judicial sympathy, so "seek justice" for her. The "expert" just didn't report to the police, and the crime did not lead to death. As a result, he was released on the surface, but he would be treated like a little girl with "no one to negotiate." One second is still "seeking justice" for the little girl, and the next second the "expert" will become another little girl.
View more about White Christmas reviews
