The most famous is the Kubrick version. Black and white film. Kubrick is really my nemesis, every time I watch his movies I can't eat for days. Of course this has nothing to do with affordability. When I watched his old man's film of Lolita, except for the choice of actors, the others were written by Ku Lao, and the film itself was impeccable. I believe that the old man is also very helpless about this, because the Lolita described in the book is only 12 years old, and the actor's age was raised to 15 years old in order to pass the censorship during the filming. The feeling of people is 17-20 years old... So the artistic conception in the original book has been destroyed a lot. More like an original movie than an altered movie. Napokov, the original author of "Lolita", said after watching the movie: The director is amazing, the plot is wonderful, there are excellent actors, and he makes a first-class movie, but he only used a little bit of fur in his novel!
In 1997, France remade the film, and the heroine Dominic Swan performed well. Although she is the same age as Su (15 years old), this beautiful French girl shows the innocence of a 12-year-old girl. The first appearance of Lolita in the film is extremely amazing:
this is the beginning of the so-called evil relationship.
Lolita, the light of my life, the fire of my lust. my sin, my soul. Luo - Li - Tower: The tip of the tongue is upward, in three steps, from the upper jaw down gently on the teeth. Lo. Korea. tower.
----The first chapter of "Lolita", the
97th edition of the film begins with a beautiful idyllic landscape, emerald green colors and dim sunlight. Professor Humbert murmured those famous words while driving half-dead. In his hand he held a black hairpin for girls. Lo. Korea. tower.
This person is already in deep... undoubted.
Lowe had a stunning appearance. On the lawn in the sun, the clothes were all wet. Two curvy braids, a maturing body, playful braces, and that... that bright smile.
Professor Humbert did move into the house because of her, because she was married to her mother. Everything is because of her. I will not go into details about the subsequent development of the plot. I believe that everyone has a basic understanding. The last ending is sad and ridiculous. Lolita told him in the face of infatuated Humbert: She liked the impotent old man from the beginning. For a split second, we all heard the sound of Professor Humbert's broken heart turning to ashes.
Lolita, flattering in my eyes. She's quirky, she's naughty and cute, she's informal, and she's naturally innocent with a grassy scent. The immature girl is full of contradictions and petty temper, and youth is wanton. Lolita, in my eyes, is also a slutty goblin. Although she is underage, she fantasizes that she is as sexy and attractive as a mature woman. She used casual seduction to maintain her unethical relationship with her adoptive father for two years. She is innocent, she is seductive. Under the sun, the man drove her car all the way and drove her down the dusty road. Laughing loudly, her red lips spit out a vague and extravagant sound. Eyes roll, and the childishness can't hide the sexy and charming. She made him fall, made him infatuated, made him abandon everything and fell into moral hell. The fruit of sin is ripening, Lolita...you are a goblin that smells of green apples, and you exude an alluring scent like a forbidden fruit.
I don't know what the world thinks of her, maybe Luo is just an ordinary and a little precocious fifteen-year-old (twelve-year-old) girl, she likes the handsome men in the pictorial like her peers, and hopes that she is the same as the female star in the advertisement. sexy. She painted her lips scarlet, but her unintentional laughter was so incongruous like a silver bell. This is the seduction between girls and women. Humbert is infatuated with her, and despite crossing the moral line, he is still so madly infatuated with her.
And Lolita, her association with Humbert made her even more willful and slutty...
The "immorality" of the book is mentioned in various introductions to Lolita (the book) and in the translations of the editions. It is true that a middle-aged man and an underage girl's terrific love is not moral, not to mention that the relationship between the adoptive father and daughter of the two is incest... The author did not even dare to sign his real name after the book was written. And the publication was repeatedly rejected, and after reluctantly published, he has been with erotic novels. Changes in the world, as a literary work, ignore the moral bottom line it contains, the author's unique creative style, and extraordinary narrative skills, so that "Lolita" has been included in the 100 books that have affected the world since World War II. In 1958, the American version of "Lolita" was published, which caused a strong sensation, and the comments were flooded for a while. And the author used his superb flicking skills to write so-called erotic scenes, making many readers with bad motives feel cheated. In fact, the immorality of the book is not because of pornography, but Humbert's immoral obsession with his adopted daughter.
Leaving the discussion of literature and ethics and turning to the field of psychology, "Lolita" has undoubtedly become an interesting research object. I can't help but say that the male protagonist's abnormal love has been involved in the scope of pedophilia... Lolita has gradually deviated from the healthy mental state of a normal girl---- the 97 version of the movie where Lolita rushed out in the rain The scene points out that Lolita's mental state was already distorted by whatever relationship she had at the time, and she only knew how to balance her mentality with indiscriminately asking Humbert for money and incessantly throwing tantrums at him. Finally, Lolita's final confession also leads to Philoid's arguments about the Electra. And Lolita's mother, who has been neglected by us for a long time, is also a selfish and ruthless representative, adding evil words to her daughter for her own happiness. As for Lolita's real crush, it's an obscene impotent. In his introduction to "Lolita" written by Dr. John Ray Jr., Dr. Ray stated that "Lolita" will undoubtedly become a classic case in the field of psychiatry. More important to us as a work of art than its scientific and literary value is the ethical impact the book will have on readers; for in this poignantly personal study, lurking Invoking a universal doctrine: wayward children, selfish mothers, breathless lunatics—these are not just a few vivid characters in a unique novel: they alert us to dangerous tendencies; they point out potential sin.
View more about Lolita reviews
