The actors in the second half are relatively tense, and the first half of the plot is a bit boring. It's basically a story about an old man falling in love with a girl with young teeth. Although the details of the color scheme are in place and beautiful, the depth of the content is average. In the second half, Lolita started to resist and quarreled for the first time. To the premeditated departure at the back, to the emotional response of the old man to their relationship, desire or reason? Daughter or lover? Corresponding to Lolita's emotions, it is because she wants to get out of her mother's control to find what she likes and learn the ballet she wants to learn. Instead of living according to the mother's wishes. But what she didn't expect was that she wanted to use this old man to escape the bondage life, but she lost her mother because of it. And she still didn't get the life she hoped to live, nor did she learn the modern dance and ballet she liked, but followed this old man to live the man's dream life. This old man took her on a car trip. For Lolita, to a certain extent, this old man has started a new round of her, and has stricter control over her than her mother (family affection). Is it love? I think this part may be what the director wants the audience to think about. In an intimate relationship, is one party's almost morbid desire to control the other party really love because of the so-called love? This is the part I see in the second half. In the face of such warm feelings, Lolita's attitude from the very beginning will naturally arouse her desire for freedom. So she planned how to escape again, and she succeeded, and she lived the so-called happy life she wanted. It may be because of the plot. Three years later, she still uses the same method to ask the old man for money again. It can be seen in the plot that she is also smoking a cigarette with a big belly. Living in a shabby house can be found from the things in the house. In fact, her material life has become worse than when she was with the old man. In terms of class, I think it can be analyzed from her family of origin, which is a straight-line descent process. It turned out that when she was at her mother's house, she was a girl with a maid and a house (although it may be messy, but she should be considered a rich child, and her mother also let her go to a noble school). Although the old man was a teacher, to put it bluntly, he wanted to rent their house when he went to live in her house. So after Lolita followed him, the economy can only be said to be well-off. There is no problem with food and clothing, but there is no maid. The old men also traveled constantly and estimated that Lolita was also very good at spending money. In fact, they seemed to live a tight life. So there will be later, Lolita runs away with the star playwright who likes to keep dogs with a gold ring. But at the end of the story, the director pushed the plot to a turning point. Lolita finally seems to find an ordinary man, who looks like a worker and gets married. (I think this part will be There are still differences in the teaching profession.) At least with the uncle, I still play the piano and tennis. It is the life of different classes. She is in this place. I can see that her home is full of playing cards and the like, which also reflects that even if she lowers her living standard, she still wants to be free. But in fact, the bondage her mother gave her at first should be able to escape when she becomes an adult. Maybe her life would be different that way. The bondage of family and love is what everyone needs to face and choose. Movies are still movies, and art is still art. Maybe life won’t magnify these relationships as movies, but it’s worth thinking about the contradictions among moviegoers. My personal understanding is: the bondage of family affection is love, and in love, mutual understanding may be required, rather than the endless possession of one party, that is not love.
Going back to the title I took, in fact, everyone needs to have free space and freely choose the life they live. Everyone is different, but how to walk is the part that everyone really needs to consider carefully. Years are fleeting, you need to be cautious in your choices, and the attitude towards life that is down-to-earth and independent may be what I admire. Well, the emotions of the actors in the whole drama are very tense, and the second half of the content rhythm is very tight. Overall 4 stars, and I have one to be buckled... I didn't like the whole script very much in the first half (the old man likes the theme of young girls, and the girls in the back are not very independent... Still using the same routine, reach out to ask for it Money to live, depend on others)
View more about Lolita reviews
