1 star: The overall shooting picture quality is recognized. There are carnage shots but not gore-for-gore-for-gore-for-gore-for-gore-for-gore-in-the-gore-in-a-way-of-shoots that I approve of. Assuming that the whole article is full of blood-blooded and brain-splitting pictures, the movie is close to a horror movie in such a massacre, which should not be its main intention.
2 stars for: Terrorist Reality. In addition to the cruelty, when he faced the emotional breakdown of whether his parents received money after the heroine who recited the Koran gave up shooting and was injured, the brainwashing terrorist attack that the film wants to express can be thought-provoking.
3 stars for: The rhythm is tight. There was no urine point for two hours. I said that the rhythm in the second half was slightly worse. I will explain it in the deduction item, but my friends and I have never had a urine point to indicate that the rhythm is still online. This point can be given.
Less 1 star: The plot is for the plot, and the character's dementia lacks some real logic.
Example 1, a hotel guest used to be a special forces soldier and was a commander. It is said that without weapons and equipment, it is difficult for a clever woman to cook without rice, but when she accompanies the heroine and decides to escape from the "secret room", she has no escape plan, and she was not killed in the stairwell because she was trying to find the heroine who had gone the wrong way. The plot of molecular hijacking is too brainless and does not meet the attributes that characters should have.
Lee 2, the escape route of the "room of secrets" was exposed by a guest who was preparing to escape. This kind of "little cleverness" does not exist for the moment of refugees. When the hotel is set on fire and the smoke has begun to spread, you can only choose to escape or stay in such a pressing time. Call the reporter at this time, the point is! Ask the reporter for help and tell me how I plan to escape! Is this to show that Asan is really stupid? The truth of the incident is also mentioned in the documentary. In order to "show" himself to the public, a senior Indian official exposed the "secret room" in the hotel in an interview with reporters, which made the commander of this terrorist attack. Know where the rest of the crew are hiding. Therefore, it is too unrealistic to join as a refugee.
Example 3, among the couples who escaped from the cafe to the hotel, the girl was shot and rescued to the "secret room", shouting the whole time. The pain in the pectoralis major is indeed worse when the gun hits the pectoralis major, but in an emergency, I witness people in the hotel lobby who will be shot by machine guns as long as there is a little movement. Even if the pain is so painful that they need to shout out, they will have a sense of reason to suppress themselves. Shouting, at least you won't let yourself grow up and shout out. But in order to make the audience nervous, the actress kept moaning before and after entering the "Secret Room", even when the hotel staff took her to escape to seek a doctor, and she mistakenly thought she was a terrorist when she met the police. Can you mute your voice again and run away... The logic is too imprecise, just to make the audience nervous, is the character going to be demented?
Example 4, the male and female protagonists are looking for each other to find children. Personally, I feel that this paragraph should be implanted here with the Jewish couple + Turkish couple. But in this case, the two people who are not familiar with the hotel without any weapons on their bodies run around blindly just to confirm that the other party is alive, even if they are worried about their children, but the trajectory of their actions is too mindless, causing the male and female protagonists to run around blindly. were taken hostage. And neither of them is as strong as a nanny holding a baby who will cry at any time. And before the heroine walked out of the "secret room", the child and the nanny were still in the "secret room"! Don't you worry about your kids now? The truth is that the Jewish couple was brutally murdered, and the babysitter with their child had been succumbing to the basement and evaded the search. Wisdom is evident.
The remaining examples are not presented due to uncertainty about the prototype of the real event. For example, the front desk calls the guest to warn the guest, but there is no alertness in a position where the back is completely exposed. A friend said that this is an adaptation of a drama, and it is a movie, so you don't have to be so serious, you should watch a documentary if you are serious. But I have to say that the "adaptation based on real events" at the beginning of the film made me always have a mentality of understanding the events and expressing sympathy for the suffering of the unbelieving victims. But this adaptation made me dance frequently, and after the end, only my love for the chef and actors was left... Even the adaptation should be logical, after all, this film emphasizes real events.
Less 2 stars: The subject matter has not been raised or even a little one-sided. I don't want to elaborate on this, and I won't be able to publish it. All in all, downgrades.
In the end, the dog's head saved his life, and Hamlet's theory went online, which only means that the individual accepts the rational refutation and does not accept the lifting bar of the parking garage. This is the first time I wrote a film review, probably because my expectations for the film were too high, so Quan should keep a record for himself.
View more about Hotel Mumbai reviews
