I've been wanting to read this story for a while now. I read the first book of Xu Zherong's novel class, and there is a chapter in which the ending of the murder on the Orient Express is written, and then I found the movie to see it. You will feel a little clueless. I haven't read the original book yet, but I'll have to read it in detail when I have time. The description of the process can't see anything with my IQ. It's like watching Detective Conan. The evidence is there, but I still don't know anything. Only when these twelve people gathered, Polo explained each one in detail, and found out the relationship between each person and the family of the deceased in the previous case, that he knew what the motives of the twelve people were. I don't know the principles of that era, is revenge okay? Or is the law not to blame? But if this case is placed in the current era, the ending may change. Even if it is for revenge, these people should be punished by the law in the end, or if the revenge was a person at that time? What will be the ending, or are these twelve tied together just to escape the punishment of the law?
At the beginning of narrating the case, Poirot first told a lie and made his own choice. He knew the truth and the complexity of human nature.
Perhaps, if there is no first lie, just say the truth and tell the truth, and the criminals will be punished by the law, perhaps this novel and movie may not be so exciting.
View more about Murder on the Orient Express reviews
