At midnight, the Orient Express on the European road was stopped because of heavy snow. In the morning, an American businessman was found dead in his carriage. There are twelve different wounds on the body, and the clues that keep appearing seem to point to different suspects, which makes people confused. Meanwhile, Detective Poirot on the train begins his investigation. This is adapted from the famous British writer Agatha's detective novel Murder on the Orient Express of the same name, which was filmed in 1974. Agatha considers this the only film adaptation of her life that she is completely satisfied with. In this film, there are many characters, and due to the particularity of the case, all the characters who appear are important and indispensable. During the filming, the monologue of the protagonist alone was as many as eight pages, let alone the scene where everyone was talking together. The equipment was too much to fit in the carriage, and the filming was repeated many times. But obviously, the director has a solid foundation and handles this complex case well with these intricate characters. On the Orient Express, in the long and narrow aisles, in the independent carriages, each character on the car appeared in turn, and all of them were vivid and three-dimensional. The director's character scheduling is strategized, the details are displayed, and the lines and the scene are fully integrated. Like at the beginning of the film, the protagonist appears on the boat, and the escorts beside him thank the protagonist for helping solve the case and introduce him to what will happen on this journey. The protagonist asks him the questions in the introduction in French, a rigorous and meticulous detective The image appeared. At the same time, due to the rich facial expressions of the escorts, this paragraph also brings some humor. After meeting with his friends, his friends with an Italian accent strongly invited him to take the Orient train where he served as a director, showing the image of a passionate Italian businessman. Before getting into the car, a lady with a Swedish accent eagerly looked for the idol, and the image of a soft and waxy female missionary came into the hearts of the people. In just a few minutes, the approximate personalities and occupations of the three characters emerged. Not to mention that due to the homicide case and the particularity of the case, the protagonist talked with the passengers in the car one by one, and showed the characteristics of each passenger step by step through lines, actions, and expressions, so that the audience was familiar with their characters. Heart. At that time, it was a role model for group dramas. This Orient Express running in the snow is very famous and is a symbol of status in an era. Istanbul Railway Station, bustling with people in various costumes, accompanied by the long whistle of the train, the story slowly unfolded. Although the director focuses on the development of the case as much as possible, due to the characterization of the characters and the pursuit of detailed description. The film tells the background of the story that happened decades ago, not just a simple splicing of various retro elements. Various characters in the film speak different languages, past experiences, elegant etiquette, and the titles of princess and jazz all vividly and vividly show the life of the upper class in the 1930s, with a lot of style and flavor of the times. The film's set and props are also very well set. There are heavy pleated curtains hanging on the wall of the car, and crystals that are sparkling without a bit of dust seem to enter a magical world transformed by warm and shiny brass and luxurious wood, and feel the era of that era. The grace of that class of people. The chef who carefully checked the ingredients before driving also inadvertently told us what a great food feast will be in the car, leaving unlimited imagination. Although some of the performances in the film may seem a little exaggerated now, the film is definitely a star-studded film, including at least six Oscar winners. In the film, you can see many veteran stars in the 1960s and 1970s and newcomers who were popular at that time. One of the most famous is the Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman, who played the humble preacher. She also won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for the film. The prelude of the film explains the kidnapping case related to the murder case in a purely visual way, revealing the cause and rationality of the case. And it satisfactorily demonstrated the ups and downs of the original story. A case happened on the train. There were many passengers on the train. Anyone could be the murderer, but there was only one murderer, but this time everyone was the murderer. At the end, the protagonist proposed two conclusions, and finally chose to tell the police the wrong conclusion, which also aroused people's thinking about the just confrontation between morality and law. The prelude of the film explains the kidnapping case related to the murder case in a purely visual way, revealing the cause and rationality of the case. And it satisfactorily demonstrated the ups and downs of the original story. A case happened on the train. There were many passengers on the train. Anyone could be the murderer, but there was only one murderer, but this time everyone was the murderer. At the end, the protagonist proposed two conclusions, and finally chose to tell the police the wrong conclusion, which also aroused people's thinking about the just confrontation between morality and law. The prelude of the film explains the kidnapping case related to the murder case in a purely visual way, revealing the cause and rationality of the case. And it satisfactorily demonstrated the ups and downs of the original story. A case happened on the train. There were many passengers on the train. Anyone could be the murderer, but there was only one murderer, but this time everyone was the murderer. At the end, the protagonist proposed two conclusions, and finally chose to tell the police the wrong conclusion, which also aroused people's thinking about the just confrontation between morality and law. Although some of the performances in the film may seem a little exaggerated now, the film is definitely a star-studded film, including at least six Oscar winners. In the film, you can see many veteran stars in the 1960s and 1970s and newcomers who were popular at that time. One of the most famous is the Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman, who played the humble preacher. She also won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for the film. The prelude of the film explains the kidnapping case related to the murder case in a purely visual way, revealing the cause and rationality of the case. And it satisfactorily demonstrated the ups and downs of the original story. A case happened on the train. There were many passengers on the train. Anyone could be the murderer, but there was only one murderer, but this time everyone was the murderer. At the end, the protagonist proposed two conclusions, and finally chose to tell the police the wrong conclusion, which also aroused people's thinking about the just confrontation between morality and law. Although some of the performances in the film may seem a little exaggerated now, the film is definitely a star-studded film, including at least six Oscar winners. In the film, you can see many veteran stars in the 1960s and 1970s and newcomers who were popular at that time. One of the most famous is the Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman, who played the humble preacher. She also won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for the film. The prelude of the film explains the kidnapping case related to the murder case in a purely visual way, revealing the cause and rationality of the case. And it satisfactorily demonstrated the ups and downs of the original story. A case happened on the train. There were many passengers on the train. Anyone could be the murderer, but there was only one murderer, but this time everyone was the murderer. At the end, the protagonist proposed two conclusions, and finally chose to tell the police the wrong conclusion, which also aroused people's thinking about the just confrontation between morality and law.
View more about Murder on the Orient Express reviews
