Enjoy this movie with the mentality of Chunge

Kimberly 2022-04-19 09:02:21

In other words, seriously you lose.
When I watched it for a while, I felt that the comedy style of this movie was familiar, and it was the kind I didn't appreciate very much, but it was very popular among American Jewish comedians since the 1990s (note that Jews are known in mainstream American comedies). take up a large chunk).
Try to describe it, a style that combines British satire with Jewish self-deprecating spirit. The most common form is to create a scene that would be extremely embarrassing for a normal person, and then feature the embarrassed protagonist and make the audience laugh.
Representative works are "Seinfeld" and "Curb Your Enthusiasm". The creators of the two sitcoms are the same group.
Curb Your Enthusiasm has this humor from start to finish. For example, the protagonist took money to buy flowers for his wife, and lost the money on the way. He happened to see someone taking a lot of flowers to the cemetery, so he waited for them to leave and stole the flowers they put in the cemetery. As a result, the person who brought the flowers to the wife was the person who put the flowers in the cemetery, and they even found out (the face of the protagonist was close-up at this time).
A development of this style is to ask a person questions in reality that others would never ask out of politeness.
For example, ask a dwarf: "Do you get on the bus to buy an adult ticket or a child ticket?"
Ask a fat man: "Do you know what it looks like when you die from a heart attack? It's like this..." (Begins acting) For
example, ask a religious person: "You Do you think God cares about your wishes?"

The drama is about how the protagonist solves himself, and the comedy is about how to put others in it, torment them in every possible way, and admire their funny faces.
This kind of comedy often puts the protagonist in an awkward position, making the audience feel so uncomfortable for him that they feel sympathetic. So I don't really like it, but it's very popular in the US.

I just want to say that the film "The Absurdity of Religion" was created by the same group of people as the two comedies mentioned above.
Really, seeing the atheists sympathize with the believers, those devout believers sweating profusely in front of the giggling host, it's so pitiful.
But if you take it too seriously and hate the movie, you lose.
You know, this is a comic effect by design. The point of this film is not to find out the absurdity of religion, because anyone who will watch this film knows that religion is absurd. This movie isn't about educating the audience (like a regular documentary), but it's about getting people inside and outside the film together and having a good laugh.
The angle of appreciation of this joke can only be compared by Brother Chung around me. Now the Tichun brother religion is a bit outdated. I would like to remind those who have faded memories that the essence of the spring brother religion is to satirize blind religious beliefs and absurd stories of religious miracles.

View more about Religulous reviews

Extended Reading

Religulous quotes

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] What about when innocent people get killed during a "defensive action"?

    Michael Bray: I'm for that. Yeah. It's collateral damage.

    Bill Maher: But it's acceptable?

    Michael Bray: We've got to consider what the real issue is here and what the cost is and the risk.

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] This is the Anne Frank house, when you see it you really understand how true that phrase "The banality of evil" really is. One of the common arguments in defence of religion is that Hitler wasn't religious and neither was Stalin or Mao and they were bad so religion is good. But like religion itself it's an argument that really depends a lot on not thinking too deeply. For one Hitler himself didn't eliminate anyone personally he had a lot of footsoldiers most of whom were good Christians and they pushed people into the ovens. Religion has done a bad job of stepping up and preventing violence-prone bullies from doing their thing. If anything it usually justifies acts of madness. And 20th Century Fascism and Communism while not strictly religions as we've come to think of religion, really were religions. They were state religions. Hitler was seen as infallable and Godlike. Hirohito was absolutely a God on Earth to the Japanese people. We shouldn't get too hung up on the word religion. The bottom line is whether people think and act rationally or not and whenever they organise their lives around something that could best be described as groundlessness bad things happen. Even if the central story seems harmless like there's a God who loves you so much that he had his only Son whacked so that you could keep on sinning. Still, doesn't matter, once reality has left the building, once it's up there in the ether then anything can be extrapolated or tacked on by Preachers and Priesthoods and delusionals and power-hungry pricks. It's not that big a step from "your God is the only God and he loves you very much" to "you really should get out there and start killing for him" Whenever people believe in something utterly groundless because they were told it by a charismatic preacher and Hitler was nothing if not that, all bets are off. Nazism was a religion, a religion based on the insane fiction that Jews were subhuman vermin who did not deserve to live, but people and people not from a primitive society believed it because A they liked the preacher, B the other sheep around them were buying into it even though it was crazy and C it was inextricably tied to their view of a glorious Valhalla-like future. A, B, C. Religion.