Inherited the love of the same director's previous drama "Force Majeure in Love", but the film's satire on human nature is too complex and fragmented, which affects the smoothness of viewing, and may be due to cultural and social background differences, some content If you fail to fully grasp the irony proposition of the book, it may be that the North, especially the Swedes, will understand it better and resonate.
Part of what I can understand is that the director wants to show his superiority by giving the protagonist who plays the role of the upper-class successful people in the film to those in need, and to help others but be tricked into stealing their wallets. I guess he wants to satirize those who are left in Wuzhou. People love to take refugees and only suffer the consequences in the end. The contempt for the beggars and the conditional alms were ignored, and the attitude towards the beggars changed drastically after the wallets were not retrieved and after they were retrieved. Excessive tolerance of a mentally ill person undermining the entire exchange and sharing session reveals that Europe advocates the tolerance of the people of great love to the minority (refugees) and harms the interests of most people, criticizes and criticizes the equality and choice between the minority and the public. Needle Bianstone. These are all redeeming points.
But some plots are more obscure, such as the boy who is so stubborn that he wants the protagonist to go home with him and explain to his parents that he is not a thief, and the American female reporter who has a one-night stand with the protagonist who asks him to reveal his name. They are supposed to reflect the characteristics of a certain type of people in Europe, but they don't quite understand it. The chimpanzee that appeared in the female reporter's house and the humanoid orangutan that appeared at the grand dinner may also be a form of performance art. If you want to express the attitude of turning a deaf ear and protecting yourself when others are attacked, and finally because someone breaks the situation To drive other groups of people to rebel, then I think this expression is a bit too much.
There is no explanation for why the protagonist suddenly finds his conscience and desperately tries to find the address of the stubborn boy in the garbage heap and comes to the door to apologize for the letter he sent indiscriminately before, and what is the purpose of arranging his two daughters to his house?
The final conclusion may be that I am not enough for the class to appreciate this master work!
View more about The Square reviews
