——Excerpted from Bambi's review "Love, So Prosperous, So Lonely"
I saw this joke before and didn't remember the protagonist. After watching the movie After reading the film review, I remembered again.
Is it for the taboo of the royal family, afraid of being "harmonious"?
If this part is placed in the part where two people quarrel, the sense of conflict and expressiveness will be much stronger... The
film could be better, wrong The fault is that the screenwriter and director want to attribute the central idea to the "pure" love in a chaotic world and can't find more evidence, so the filming was tepid, and all the plots were handled like lukewarm water.
In fact, it is good to restore the history.
In Europe at that time, the situation between kings and nobles was the same as we are now familiar with the village chief's daughter marrying the party secretary's son, the director of industry and commerce, and the director of education as in-laws. The natural nature of marriage is political.
Now who knows what the specific reasons are behind the above-mentioned order, and who can guarantee that the sentence is not made because the two people must attend the ceremony at the same time the next day. What about concessions?
It’s normal for Victoria to be controlled since she was a child; her behavior after marriage is normal; after Elbert’s death, her extreme performance is normal. It’s
just that the film made me feel that these are all normal. Not normal anymore.
View more about The Young Victoria reviews