I even think that "Brave" is not an action movie, nor a comic book hero, she is just an ordinary person, a victim. For such a weak woman, when he saw her lover being beaten to death by brutal gangsters, she recovered her body, but could never recover her mind. Her fear of the society and her distrust of the law enforcers made her take on the role of a substitute. The road of Liangshan heroes, which is the way of heaven and the way of eliminating violence and peace.
I think there are two things that attract me the most about the whole film. The first is to see how she went on this road, how she changed from a victim to a law enforcement officer who raised guns and stripped others of their rights; the second is I want to see how this all ends, and how society and the government view this matter. Interestingly, things didn't go the way I thought, and in the end, things weren't made public, the government didn't get involved, and the only legal symbol "police" Mercer was able to avenge her husband. There is a part of the film where she interacts with the audience on the radio. Different people express different opinions. Some people agree with her method and think it is upholding justice. , the law is the right choice to solve the problem. It can be said that it is half and half, and until the end of the film, there is no conclusion to the audience whether this is right or wrong.
Such a question has been discussed for thousands of years since ancient times, and the phrase "legitimate but unreasonable" has been kept on the lips of people. Ever since the law came into being, people have always expected that the law would enable society to function according to such a restrained code of conduct, to restrain a part of those who try to deprive others of their rights, property, and lives. It is a sign of justice and justice, but the legal Justice is not the same as moral justice. In the film, her lover is deprived of her life, and she seeks the law to bring justice to her and punish those who break the rules, but the social machine doesn't always work well, law enforcement doesn't solve problems quickly, and victims often They are all on their own way to solve problems. This is not wrong, it's just that after someone else deprives you of your rights, can you deprive the other party's rights yourself? This is the focus of people's debate, okay? Can't? No one can tell.
This is what the dictionary says: "To treat ferocity with ferocity means that the person who rules has changed, but the way of tyrannical rule remains the same.". The ancients also said: "In the ancients, benevolence was the foundation and righteousness was ruled by righteousness. If righteousness does not gain satisfaction, then authority; authority comes from war, not from the middle man. Therefore, killing people to appease them is okay to kill them; attack them. If a country loves its people, it is okay to attack it; it is okay to use war to stop war, even if it is a war.” This probably means that with benevolence as the foundation, when politics fails to achieve its goals, it can use contingency means, that is, use abnormal methods. Means and methods to solve problems, this is war, and can no longer talk about neutrality and benevolence. In the second half of the sentence, a distinction is made between just wars and unjust wars, and the proposition of "eliminating war with war" and the correct attitude towards war are put forward, and a dialectical attitude towards war is advocated. Mao Zedong later quoted the phrase "to eliminate war with war". So big can fight, small can't fight?
Let's take a look at the names that ordinary people have called these self-rights defenders since ancient times, "doing justice for heaven", "removing harm for the people", "removing violence and peace", "strengthening justice", it is not difficult to see that although they violated the rules defined by the law, But it did not violate the norms and justice of society and human morality.
This topic is bound to go on forever, because human beings can never build a perfect world, harmony is a beautiful vision, but it is also just a beautiful word, and all the words that look beautiful only stay in the dictionary.
View more about The Brave One reviews
