I can only say that the fifth film is still very good-looking. It can be said that it is very one-sided or I am superficial, but I just think it is good-looking and I don’t understand why some so-called film critics insist that it is not good-looking if it is not better than the original, but I think it is very good-looking! Isn't it the reason I came to the Ice Age series because I like Scrat, who is always chasing the pinecone? Don't you just like Manfred's serious face to protect women and become crazy? Isn't it just to see the ugly and cute Sid with a sense of joy? Don't you just forget to watch the vegan tiger Diego play handsome and stupid? Where does so much depth come from? How dare you always treat this warm film as Les Miserables? If it's not funny, I really don't know how high your laugh is! If it's really deep, don't use a family warmth film to point and point, what sense of existence are you playing?
View more about Ice Age: Collision Course reviews