The male protagonist is a philosophy teacher, so I can't classify this film as a philosophy film. It just interspersed with some of my Mr. Kant's ethical content, but it is still worth thinking about, from the moral ideal of a person on the earth How should it be? I killed a bad guy who was told by the party whose interests were damaged, and helped others without the motive of committing crimes without the logic of normal people. Am I standing on the moral high ground and doing whatever I want? And what is a normal person or a reasonable logic. It should be right to eliminate evil and promote good. If it is done through normal legal channels, the image of the male protagonist is a great good person, a moral saint, who eliminates evil for the people and does not care about self-interest. But often this is not the case in reality, and normal channels can’t do it at all, so the logic of the male protagonist is more realistic. According to his logic, he has no motive for committing the crime. The whole thing should be classified as the hand of God to help which poor woman to solve trouble. In the end, of course, the main theme
View more about Irrational Man reviews
