I saw that the film critics said that this film is a simple exposition of existentialism, so I watched it with great interest. Philosophy professors who have lost their enthusiasm for life can be said to be a typical representative of this example. They have conducted a series of peaceful attempts to change the world, such as parades, charity, and publications. There are changes. In the end, the murder of an unjust judge for a vulnerable mother gave her an antidote to the meaning of life and existence. Emma Stone's entire discovery of his murder was superfluous. And because of the practice of this murder, the professor, who has regained his love for life, must not make mistakes and try to kill Emma Stone again and again. The professor's change is not difficult to understand, but the moral discussion of the matter itself when he has the idea of murder, the discussion of whether the unjust judge is a good father, and the discussion of whether there is a complete villain (if the previous article does not hold) , (if the previous article is established) the discussion on the right to report the correct method of severely punishing the wicked and the good murderer (similar to the seven deadly sins?) is not effective, and the discussion on whether to surrender to help the scapegoat who was caught by mistake is possible Further in-depth and interesting content. Emma Stone's love for the professor and the morally unhesitating choice to expose him in order to save a scapegoat makes the character less full.
View more about Irrational Man reviews
