In the play, the male protagonist clearly knew the existence of the murderer and the murderer also knew that the male protagonist was in the house, but why didn't he go after the male protagonist carefully? That time under the table was more meant to release water, so you have a good idea? Maybe he is a bald gangster as mentioned by the friend above. Because he doesn't know the location and password of the safe, he will deliberately let the male lead walk in the house to give him a chance to open the safe. I even doubt that the murderer turned it over. When I came to the cabinet only to find that there were no bullets and no pistols, and deliberately let the male protagonist get the password, the probability that the murderer is a black bald man is really not small, and another murderer always likes to catch alive and put it in a box as bait, then it can be denied that the male protagonist is actually him. The target of the house is not the owner of the house, because the owner has been killed long ago. Can we think that each bait is actually an outsider used to make a scapegoat? This is a good explanation for why after catching the owner and his wife With so many agencies, the last old man in the box might be the woman’s lover. He didn’t turn on the lights since he entered the house, and he was in a hurry to make out. The purpose of the black bald head is to find objects and familiarize themselves with the structure. Some people in the police remove the fish that slipped through the net and provide police information, and then wait for an outsider to come in. Only if they can get the property and someone can be a scapegoat, it can be regarded as perfect!
View more about The Collector reviews
