feel good and awkward at the same time.
I think that the heroine can travel back to change the past, and it will not have any effect after that. The time and space she travels back should be similar but different.
In addition, it is mentioned in the animation that time cannot be retroactive, so the only one who travels back is herself, According to my superficial sci-fi knowledge, this is contradictory, right? Unless those time and space exist, the heroine just moves in different time and space each time.
Both the heroine and the hero can travel through.
We are in the perspective of the heroine at the beginning. The
heroine Every time the male protagonist he faces back through time travel may have already used the opportunity of time travel. Facts have used them.
Facts have used them, at least before the time when the male protagonist saved people. Why do you say "at least"? Because Following the premise of crossing into different time and space, every time the female protagonist travels back, facing a male protagonist who may have passed through, the number of times the male protagonist has used is random! It may be 9 times, 99 times, 0 times, 1 time, any number is possible.
At this time, she met a male protagonist who had only one chance left, too! I can only assume that the author chose this specific time and space to develop the story.
Then, The male protagonist used that opportunity to save people. In theory, the bruised female protagonist does not know, the female protagonist is already in a state of immobility, she can only be trapped in her last time and space, witnessing friends Killed.
Because everything about the male protagonist is random, it is assumed that the male protagonist is at the scene in this time and space. At this time, the male protagonist saves people out of his own will. It is said that it is "out of his own will" because , he saved this person purely for self-comfort, only he can see it, he can't change the fact that in another time and space, his friend has died once. The animation also mentioned that it is true. In the time and space that he can't change In, the heroine is bruised and witnesses the death of a friend, that time and space is that heroine - the one we see from the beginning - the final ending.
Therefore, when the male protagonist speaks to the female protagonist who has another chance to cross, it is not the same person.
It is worth noting that our perspective becomes the male protagonist at least at that moment.
Of course, the male protagonist encounters The heroine who has only one chance to travel through is also a coincidence. I assume the author has made another choice.
But what I can't explain is why this heroine still retains the previous memory, especially being bruised and killed by a friend That part of , that is, what happened in that "fractured" time and space. (Does it have to be explained as a choice?)
There is a more important plot, which is also inexplicable: why does the male protagonist know the female protagonist timeleap? His words deduced that he knew more than one point.
Since this is a girl-oriented work, the narrative perspective returned to the heroine. The hero said goodbye to her, and then disappeared. She used the last chance to get the The promise that can be realized.
To sum up, the reason why this story is what we see now is actually "the result of the author's intentional choice". This result is undoubtedly more difficult, it can be more satisfactory, of course it is possible It ’s even harder.
The problem lies in the setting that was deduced at the beginning: infinite space-time.
Is there any alternative to this explanation?
I thought there was, that is, the space-time that exists is the space-time that has happened. But think about it, this is not the same as the infinite In fact, it is the same, and it cannot be said that it has become limited.
Supplement: It is impossible to explain why the heroine retains broken memories without "choice", because if she retains those memories, it means that the time and space of the hero and her have overlapped ( This also doesn't happen with a change of perspective). But I can't find a reason to say that other than using "choice" again.
Another unexplainable plot, using "time-space coincidence" creates bigger problems. Which moment is The coincidence moment?
For convenience, assume the narrative point of view of the male protagonist.
I only know that it was later than the last time the heroine crossed to the playground to play, because at that time the hero didn't even know that the heroine could timeleap. For the hero, this should be an earlier time and space, he lost that nucleus but I haven't found out that the heroine picked it up. There are countless male protagonists in the same situation, and at least one of them was picked up by the heroine, and this is the one I'm talking about now. But even if he tries to travel back many times, due to the probability Too small, and he can't learn more about the situation in a limited number of times, and he can only feel at ease because of the object that has obtained the ability to travel through time and space, not the process. This is not mentioned much in the animation.
The time when the male protagonist discovered the timeleap, Earlier than the heroine called the hero on the slope, that is, before 4 o'clock. But for him, it is completely impossible to determine when, because the analysis just now is based on the situation that there is no overlap, and it has developed very Complex time and space relationship. If time and space overlap, things will never become simpler.
There is a perhaps related question, apart from the expression effect, why does time stop after the male protagonist saves people? Is it implying something?
Who will do it for me Clear the confusion. Thank you very much.
View more about The Girl Who Leapt Through Time reviews
