The film reveals the helplessness of aging and loneliness all the time, exploring the secret that made Sherlock Holmes abandon the detective and return to beekeeping 35 years ago. To be honest, looking at the old man, I was actually filled with emotion. A thing called loneliness was quietly born. I thought that I must find a partner in my lifetime, and I can't be alone forever. I thought again, in fact, the longest love is to accompany.
The common problem of British landscape films is that the plot is slow, and it’s okay to be slow and slow. What I care about is what made Holmes give up his life’s career and live in seclusion to keep bees. I imagined that he would investigate a case and wronged a good man, imagined that he would lose to a criminal with high IQ, and even imagined that he accidentally killed his beloved woman... However, when the truth was revealed, I refused to admit that this is what Sherlock Holmes would do. There are even 10,000 grass-mud horses galloping past in my heart, just like this, like this, this way, and I will go into hiding. I see through it, and there is clearly nothing wrong, and nothing is right. If this is the so-called truth, sorry, this is not Sherlock Holmes!
The three timelines in the film, I estimate how much they intersect, and how they will be combined in a surprising way. In the end...the 10,000 grass-mud horses in my heart have been lost to the so-called truth about giving up their careers and reclusive beekeeping. I was shocked and couldn't move, so I just wanted to say: Okay... There is really no need to add a time line for such a far-fetched relationship. But it doesn't matter, because the truth of giving up my career and living in seclusion of beekeeping has shocked me to the ground, almost kneeling to the screenwriter!
Back to the truth: Was Sherlock Holmes at fault? Is there something wrong? Is there something wrong? Ten thousand times in my heart, I asked myself, this is something that a normal and rational person would do. What did he do wrong and where was his guilt? Don't say that the young woman hints that something is wrong with you. Even if you listen to her more, how can you do it? Wouldn't it be right to persuade her to go back to her husband? Shouldn't it be like saying "Come and live with me?" as if you were asking yourself at the end? Is this three-pointed view correct? correct? correct? Is this an appropriate statement for a young woman who has only known each other for a few days and talked for a quarter of an hour? Does it fit? Does it fit?
What lonely hearts comfort each other? Obviously she is a married woman, but she feels that her husband does not understand her and has lost her child. Isn't the best way to communicate with her husband more? Could it be that the best way is to have a relationship with someone who is so old that you don't know how old you are? ? Want an old man who just met and talked for a quarter of an hour to say "Come and live with me"? ? ? ? Oh my god! Where is the logic of this movie? ? ? Where is the logic? ? Where? ? ?
In addition to the strange plot and chaotic logic, it can be regarded as a scenery film and literary film. However, I absolutely refuse to admit that this is Sherlock Holmes. This guy is obviously dressed in the guise of Sherlock Holmes and insists on thinking rationally and emotionally. He doesn’t know what conclusion he wants to reach in the end, but he actually encourages young women and old people to share loneliness and communicate with each other ( At the end of the last film, it even stated clearly: Come and live with me), this is not the inexplicable theme of elopement! !
Sherlock Holmes has emphasized countless times that it is different from what Watson wrote, so the screenwriter wants to express the ultimate mystery of being famous, but actually difficult? ? ?
I never want to believe this is Sherlock Holmes.
View more about Mr. Holmes reviews
