The whole of Hollywood seems to be experiencing a full range of "feminism" and "diversity". Therefore, elements such as blacks, Asians, homosexuals, etc. are not unexpectedly collected by this latest edition of "Charlie's Angels". Therefore, in order to perfectly interpret feminism, even the director is also a woman: Elizabeth Banks, this film should be her maiden director. And she herself also played the boss of the female agents in the film, with a familiar face but unfamiliar people (in China, she has no particularly classic heroine movies, and most of them play supporting actresses). The story is very 007, but there are not many highlights in the big action scenes, neither stunning nor explosive. Maybe, I didn't think that the old version was so good, so I don't think this version is bad. In different eras, aesthetic fatigue has been upgraded and evolved, and it is not bad to have no faults. It did not smash the old version of the big IP sign... In terms of casting, the aggressive "Twilight" Xiao K, And cute Naomi Scott (Princess Jasmine's personality changed a lot), both of them are my favorite. The third heroine, Ella Balinska, chose a black actor for political correctness, but the best black choice in my mind is Zendaya, the heroine of "Spider-Man". She is more malleable and may have a better effect. better. However, in any case, it is more reliable than the black actress selected in the 2020 version of "The Little Mermaid". . . The overall popcorn index was on par with the 2018 version of Tomb Raider, and everything was as expected. In the imagination, this movie is also the current level: a well-rounded entertainment work.
View more about Charlie's Angels reviews
