The film has the translated name "Detective Poe", and it starts with the word Detective. Even if the film can't reach the level of Sherlock Holmes' superb logical reasoning, at least there is only one puzzle solution to Conan's truth. But it's a pity that I didn't see where Poe was. He was led by the nose in the film, step by step, until he died.
It seems that many details of this film can only be understood by viewers who have read the portfolio. Therefore, I am not impressed with the fragments of the previous large and large tribute portfolios. At the very beginning of the secret room murder case, I also expected to be able to understand and understand. The detective clicked and the window opened. When I explained that this was not a secret room, I expressed disappointment.
The criteria by which the murderer chooses the target of the murder puzzles me. Whether the answer can be found in the portfolio is unknown, but I think that since it has been made into a movie, your audience will naturally include those who have never read the collection, at least It’s the right thing to ensure the integrity of the work in the movie. It can be a tribute to the original work, or it can be viewed as a new story.
The murderer's motives were blurred in the movie. In my opinion, the murderer is addicted to reading Poe's works. When Poe’s talent is not there, he tries to create it himself. Maybe he thinks Poe’s work is illusory, so he will create a realistic work. I don't know if I understand it, it's just how I feel.
View more about The Raven reviews
