I need to stay for the same reason that you have to go

Brittany 2022-04-22 07:01:40

Shawshank is art, and this one is reality. It is more shocking than the former because it is adapted from real events. The power of hope is unimaginable. He is the first person to survive the five-year confinement. The yearning for freedom, the biggest shortcoming in the film is the lack of rendering of this desire, which leads to the lack of the biggest motivation for his constant escape from prison, and the resonance is less, but it is still very good, including the two male protagonists that are moving and even a little crooked. Friendship, I have to say that the role of Papillon is really likable. Also, Charlie Hunnam is so handsome, that figure, that smile, really hit my heart

Stuart 2022-01-04 08:02:40

The 1973 version of "Papillon" was 230 minutes, and in order to speed up the pace, the remake of the 2017 version was 133 minutes. The 2017 version was introduced at the end of this month, and it was confirmed to be deleted for 24 minutes, and it was scheduled to be released on 7.26. The 2017 version has already been cut off, and another half an hour has been subtracted. There is really no need to watch it. I strongly recommend the 230-minute version of "Papillon" in 1973. It is an adaptation of real events. The actual 8 escapes are condensed into three times, which is heavy and long.