Different from many movie fans, first of all, I would like to say that empathy is not a virtue that can be cultivated, but a biological instinct, but there are huge differences between individuals. The film spends complicated foreshadowing, descriptions, footnotes and dialogues, all to guide people to seriously observe the cold, paranoid, and lack of empathy spiritual world of the protagonist, and has no intention of criticizing based on secular right and wrong. In the end, Jack just wants to build a "house", and countless "incidents" advance his process. He can criticize the "finest arts" of his achievements as not perfect, and he will eventually be destroyed, but it does not have to be from the mundane that this film does not involve. The moral dimension is forcibly projected. Secondly, Jack believes that women are easier to cooperate with victims, and he also believes that both genders have injustice and serious sins, but viewers can choose not to accept this value. Personally, I don't accept it, and some diao cancer viewers can also accept it. Others say the five incidents advance is too verbose. I can only say that the protagonist's spiritual world is promoted and the process of construction is the key point, the materials are complete, and the final "house" is a matter of course. Those who criticize the protagonist for not having the "artisan spirit", why do they want the protagonist to show you how to paint the walls and decorate? so funny.
So I think this film is satisfactory in terms of performance and conception. To sum up.
View more about The House That Jack Built reviews
