It's been a long time since I had such a drama that I felt like I had to watch it in one sitting. Decided to write down my thoughts seriously. [Think about your sister, Aziraphale and Crowley, what a beautiful love! ! Hurry up and get your certificate! ! ! Gotta get married! ! ! ] . cough cough. calm down. Feelings are still to be written. [But now I just want to read the text. immediately. immediately. Read the text. Officials have built various Paros for you for 6,000 years in human history, writers, what are you waiting for! ! ] . . cough cough. Keep calm. The following are simple thoughts. Leaving aside the part about CP, the whole show gives me the feeling that it is actually "British, too British". Aziraphale and Crowley have two roles, an angel and a demon, which are two sides of the British soul in my mind. I liked Arthur when I was in APH before because of such two sides. If Aziraphale represents the mild, restrained, hedonistic gentry side of the British temperament, like someone from Austen novels or Downton, then Crowley is the embodiment of rock spirit and cynicism. ", "Trainspotting" and "Velvet Goldmine". They certainly have something in common: fancy flirtatious and snarky one-liners. In short, the combination of the temperament of the two together is the real Britain! Aside from the characters and dialogue, the music is downright British. Crowley said "Nobody would say Velvet Underground is a BEBOP!!" It made me laugh. And his Bentley with Queen bgm, Crowley drove the Bentley with the whole car on fire with We will rock you out of the wall of fire. In the end, the explosion scene was specially equipped with a Bohemian ending to fade out, steady. Going back to the characters themselves, I feel that the reason why the two protagonists are so lovable is because of the complexity of their (god?) temperaments. In contrast, the camps they belong to are dull and pitiful, regardless of whether they are positive or negative. So it's not without reason that the two of them like human beings. The human world is where they belong. In the end, the very burning and rotten (.) us against the world It is also pointed out that the real and eternal battle will never be the so-called conflict of good and evil, or the conflict of good and evil in the traditional sense, but the confrontation between kindness, empathy and open mind and coldness, bureaucracy and conformity. The key factor that separates the two camps, I think, is imagination. I am willing to believe in the importance of the quality of "imaginative", because this is actually what impressed me the most about Terry Pratchett's work. Of course, other sci-fi writers I like very much agree with this, such as Ursula Le Guin also said: "Human life is not limited to a narrow frequency band called 'now', time and possibility , the vast world of knowledge and imagination belong to them: that is our real world, our 'now'." Although the "Good Omens" drama was released by everyone after the release of Neil Gaiman, but the original is after all He co-wrote it with Mr. Pratchett. Anyone who has seen the works of these two people should be able to roughly distinguish the part of the plot elements that belongs to Terry Pratchett and the part that belongs to Neil Gaiman. At least when I heard the narrator say that what makes Crowley special compared to other demons is that he has "imagination", I think this is too Terry Pratchett, because I think of the "Disc World" riding Thinking of the imaginary dragon soaring in the air, the spirit of the wind and the double flower! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at ignorance, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the sunset, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts. What impressed me the most about Mr. Pratchett's work. Of course, other sci-fi writers I like very much agree with this, such as Ursula Le Guin also said: "Human life is not limited to a narrow frequency band called 'now', time and possibility , the vast world of knowledge and imagination belong to them: that is our real world, our 'now'." Although the "Good Omens" drama was released after the release of the most popular Neil Gaiman, but the original is after all He co-wrote it with Mr. Pratchett. Anyone who has seen the works of these two people should be able to roughly distinguish the part of the plot elements that belongs to Terry Pratchett and the part that belongs to Neil Gaiman. At least when I heard the narrator say that what makes Crowley special compared to other demons is that he has "imagination", I think this is too Terry Pratchett, because I think of the "Disc World" riding Thinking of the imaginary dragon soaring in the air, the spirit of the wind and the double flower! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at ignorance, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the sunset, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts. What impressed me the most about Mr. Pratchett's work. Of course, other sci-fi writers I like very much agree with this, such as Ursula Le Guin also said: "Human life is not limited to a narrow frequency band called 'now', time and possibility , the vast world of knowledge and imagination belong to them: that is our real world, our 'now'." Although the "Good Omens" drama was released after the release of the most popular Neil Gaiman, but the original is after all He co-wrote it with Mr. Pratchett. Anyone who has seen the works of these two people should be able to roughly distinguish the part of the plot elements that belongs to Terry Pratchett and the part that belongs to Neil Gaiman. At least when I heard the narrator say that what makes Crowley special compared to other demons is that he has "imagination", I think this is too Terry Pratchett, because I think of the "Disc World" riding Thinking of the imaginary dragon soaring in the air, the spirit of the wind and the double flower! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at ignorance, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the sunset, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts. Le Guin also said: "Human life is not limited to the narrow band called 'the present', but the vast world of time and possibility, knowledge and imagination belongs to them: that is our real world, Our 'now'." Although Neil Gaiman was the one who wrote the most after the release of "Good Omens", he and Mr. Pratchett co-wrote the original book after all. Anyone who has seen the works of these two people should be able to roughly distinguish the part of the plot elements that belongs to Terry Pratchett and the part that belongs to Neil Gaiman. At least when I heard the narrator say that what makes Crowley special compared to other demons is that he has "imagination", I think this is too Terry Pratchett, because I think of the "Disc World" riding Thinking of the imaginary dragon soaring in the air, the spirit of the wind and the double flower! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at ignorance, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the sunset, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts. Le Guin also said: "Human life is not limited to the narrow band called 'the present', but the vast world of time and possibility, knowledge and imagination belongs to them: that is our real world, Our 'now'." Although Neil Gaiman was the one who wrote the most after the release of "Good Omens", he and Mr. Pratchett co-wrote the original book after all. Anyone who has seen the works of these two people should be able to roughly distinguish the part of the plot elements that belongs to Terry Pratchett and the part that belongs to Neil Gaiman. At least when I heard the narrator say that what makes Crowley special compared to other demons is that he has "imagination", I think this is too Terry Pratchett, because I think of the "Disc World" riding Thinking of the imaginary dragon soaring in the air, the spirit of the wind and the double flower! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at folly, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the setting sun, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts. Pratchett, because I think of the spirit and double flowers in "Disc World" riding an imagined dragon soaring in the air! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at folly, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the setting sun, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts. Pratchett, because I think of the spirit and double flowers in "Disc World" riding an imagined dragon soaring in the air! tears. When Mr. Pratchett died, Neil Gaiman wrote an essay in memory of him, titled "Unhappy, Angry Teacher Terry Pratchett, who would never have walked gently into that good night" , which reads: "There's an anger in Terry's work: that's what drives the writing of Discworld. It's a response to Terry Pratchett who thinks 6-year-old Terry Pratchett is too stupid to ever reach 11. anger at the headmaster of +; anger at pompous critics; anger at those who believe seriousness is the opposite of humor; anger at previous American publishers who failed to bring his work to success. When he leaves, he will be angry, not only at the disappearance of light, but also at folly, injustice, and human shortsightedness. As angels and demons walk side by side into the setting sun, and with this anger comes love: to love mankind, Love all our flaws, love the precious things, love the story, and most importantly, love the dignity of human nature." This is really the base color of "Good Omens". Here are some other thoughts.
I have always been able to genuinely engage in CP only when both characters are in love with each other very much. This time, the angel and demon group of GO entered the pit so quickly, also because I really liked both of them. love it. Compare hearts. Love Crowley that's a must. Yes, of course. He is so much my type. There's no way I wouldn't dislike the cynical rock lover Devil driving a blazing Bentley. that's all. period. In the play, the appearance and style of the actors are so matched with the characters that they can't tell who they are crazy about. The last (pseudo) villain that I felt so fit was Loki. Well, after all, I am the most stereotyped female audience who likes handsome guys who are rebellious, handsome and have a bit of a vulnerable temperament. I like DTT so much that I want to make up for DW (the boundless pit, be careful. The point is Aziraphale. In the original book, he wrote gayer than a treeful of monkeys on nitrous oxide (laughs, the TV series really restores this perfectly. It stands to reason that the angel is in In today's trend, it is far less easy to please the devil, because the Virgin type character is too easy to be criticized. But Aziraphale in the play really makes people feel that he is what an angel should be, kind, and not condescending Kind of, neither intimidating nor hypocritical. Impressive is when he woke up Crowley's spellcasting nun, he said, when you wake up, you'll remember that you had a very good dream, that That smile and tone of voice is genuinely reassuring. Another reason I like him subconsciously is probably because he reminds me of Bilbo Baggins tears. Really love life, love all the beautiful things and have the courage to protect them, know how to be flexible and at the same time stick to the principle of being a human (god?), and also love books! It makes me think he's not out of line to come out of Bag End. He must have liked the Hobbit life. The plot line of Devil's Son is very reminiscent of Haruhi Suzumiya, but Haruhi Suzumiya in this world is only 11 years old, and common sense has not had time to be ingrained into his mind. So in this work, we can see what would happen if Suzumiya had no common sense and realized his abilities, which is also an interesting completion. Of course, the ending is the same. Sure enough, the children of friends who treat each other with sincerity will not be completely bad. (And 11-year-old British boys can always encounter weird things! Many people find the witch's plot line boring, but I think it's still quite romantic, whether it's the old group or the young group, it's sweet and not greasy. It's disgusting. No matter how weird people are, they will meet their own people. Hope this is true in our world. Finally, about selling corrupt. I know that British TV/BBC do this and they are professional, I know what I am getting myself into. But! This! Also! Really! Too! Absolutely! Beautiful! I want to see all my cute CPs with this background. Read the text.
View more about Good Omens reviews
