1- Many civilians may be injured in the film, but they only care about a little girl. Why? Because this girl has American values: she reads books and plays hula hoop. Other people do not care about life or death. The subtext is: We talk about humanity and morality, provided that you are your own person, if not, sorry, even if you are not a terrorist, humanity and morality do not apply to you.
2- The woman who had a meeting in the United Kingdom, or quarreled with the general It always has the upper hand when you get the upper hand; or it always seems very unreasonable when it gets the upper hand. The director can use the camera, language, and plot hints to guide you to judge. It is fair on the surface, but in fact, the audience has taken the initiative to generate the views they need.
3- Chinese table tennis team training, a close-up of men in glasses playing table tennis. Why wear glasses when playing table tennis? Why choose a man of this size? You satirize the leader's posture (which is really funny and vivid). I have no problem. It is a political struggle, but you demonize Asians from a biological point of view, which I find disgusting. The key is that we go to the theater to watch this kind of movie. Asians spend their own money to brainwash themselves and imply that they are not as grown-up as whites. The reality is so dark humor.
4- Casting of black people. Go and see for yourself the looks of a few characters. I won't say more, it's really one in a hundred. It is nothing more than to put an aesthetic standard of beauty in our minds. When I was 5 years old, I saw the ugliness of white people in a magazine for the first time. Later, the whole society was beautiful with a high nose bridge and deep eye sockets. I myself was a successful brainwashed case.
5- The beautification and balance of the role. Two grass-roots pilots, full of sympathy, positive roles. So someone has to do the dirty work, right? How about the two officers of the British and American forces who directly ordered the fire? Imagine a muscular man in a military uniform orders a girl to fire. Will the audience get angry? But if the gender is changed to female and the age is around 60, will you feel better? One problem has been solved, but another problem has come. Obviously, the commander of the British army can't be a woman. Okay, let's add the plot of buying toys for his granddaughter. Isn't it more tender?
This kind of plot simply cannot happen in a real war. Chris Kyle, the sniper of the US SEAL, also emphasized in his biography that he did not regret at all after killing a child.
There are two types of people in war: those who can kill me and those who cannot kill me. There is no civilian category.
Politicians divide events into two types: those that can get me down and those that can get me to power. There is no moral category.
Morality is used to write books and make movies to make money.
Politicians make laws for the army. Soldiers bypass the regulations and kill until they feel safe. This is all human nature, there is no problem. But once you publish a movie to beautify the war, the problem starts to get serious.
View more about Eye in the Sky reviews
