I can't help but complain. Others put all the evidence in front of him. He still doesn't admit it or believes it, and he can't explain it himself. Is there a good thing in the whole drama that he promoted? ? ? Is there a piece of evidence he found? ? ? Did he ask for a testimony? ? ? Such a stupid male protagonist, really convinced.
There is obviously a better way to catch the suspect, but if he insists on arresting it on the court, it will lead to the destruction of other people's homes; the evidence of the little girl is also obtained by his lover; the logic of relevant clues is found by black female detectives; even his own home may appear. The same physical evidence as the barn looked indifferent; the same portrait given by three people didn't matter at all.
In the whole play, he doesn't believe his wife's words, nor the female detective's words, nor the little girl's words, nor his partner's words, nor the evidence in front of him. Can such a person be a policeman? ? ?
View more about The Outsider reviews
