102 Stripped Stripper Case Stripper v. Fu Erdai raped her at a bachelorette party Will Alicia, the head of the law firm Cooperative lawyer: Unable to judge Abernathy The opposing lawyer Another Will incident was caused by Will thinking that the other party would want to restore the bad influence and chose to settle . The other party offered a settlement fee of $450,000, but asked for a hush (that is, no details of the matter could be told to anyone). Plaintiffs refused to settle. Pre-trial investigation The plaintiff had worked as a prostitute. After the incident, she told her fellow stripper and driver what happened to her, and the driver suggested that she get a rape test. Trial Strategy Will decides to end the fight at the pre-trial. So try to gather arguments that are in your favor. Pre-trial investigation Kelinda and Alicia went to the company where the plaintiff worked to find the contact details of another dancer and the driver. The driver denied that he learned that the dancer was raped, and said the dancer was lying. Pre-trial In order to reduce the negative impact, the defendant wanted to seal the pre-trial material, but the judge did not allow it. Will demanded that if the defendant admitted to having consensual sex with the plaintiff, he would discard some evidence. The other party refused to admit it, so Will asked for a DNA test and asked the prosecution to release all the findings. Out-of-court investigation Alicia found out that the boss of the original driver's wife worked in a factory owned by the defendant company. The first trial driver testified: the dancer lied. Will used the driver's wife to get back a job at the factory a month after the rape to show he had a reason to lie. But the driver said that he had divorced his wife and that his wife's work had nothing to do with him. An out-of-court investigation DNA test found that the rapist's DNA did not match the defendant's. Kelinda found that the DNA results matched the DNA of an inmate who was incarcerated, indicating that either the lab made a mistake, or someone was up to it. In the second trial, the person in charge of the testing agency testified: Alicia asked that the two DNA test results pointed to the same person, and that the laboratory had almost been revoked its certification for mixing up the samples. Will requests that the sample be sent to another testing agency for retesting. The defendant requested the court not to re-test on the grounds that the samples were contaminated and no longer qualified for testing. Out of court progress Will He and Alicia came to the hotel where the incident happened, found the phone number that another dancer dialed from the hotel landline that night, and found another dancer. Third Trial Another dancer testified: She heard what the plaintiff told her, and heard the plaintiff threaten the defendant to "take the money and shut up." As a result, the judge acquitted the defendant with no physical evidence, and the plaintiff lost the case. But the prosecution claimed to have found uncontaminated DNA samples, and the defendants were arrested and will be prosecuted in a criminal case. Alicia's family, Grace, received a kit tossed at the door with a picture of Peter calling a prostitute. Zach discovered that the photos were fake because of the inconsistent highlights in the characters' eyes. They decided to hide it from their mother. Alicia thinks Zach is covering up the computer content, thinking he is watching porn. Jackie wants the kids to visit Peter and Alicia goes to ask Peter. Accidentally learned that it was Peter's lawyer who recommended Alicia to the dancer.
View more about The Good Wife reviews
