Of course, I am not qualified to narrate the level of human beings or all species, but as far as the anime Hunter is concerned, most film critics still attribute animal nature to evil and human nature to good. doctrine. In fact, the point I want to make is that all the "human nature" in chimeric ants is "beast nature". (I tried to use the ant chapter as a material to eliminate the absolute boundary of "human nature" and "beast nature", but I am too rubbish, ah! This is also a casual talk, some logic may not make sense, please don't scold me for being too fierce ,I am scared)
Both the butterfly guard and the female guard broke the contract intentionally and unintentionally; the behavior of the other male guard's compliance with the contract made Nakuru shaken, thinking that the monster was innocent. In contrast, it seems to be saying that the rational contract spirit is maintaining the operation of society, and this is indeed unique to people, but it is not the human nature to be said. In this anime, human nature should be the protection, sympathy and fraternity of the weak, and it is the free flow that comes from the depths of the heart.
Indeed, in the anime, through the mouth of the ant king and others. What is shown is that the chimeric ants are affected by "human nature" and their consciousness is shaken. In the game after game with wheat, the subtle emotions generated by the ant king, and later completely showed concern for the weak. When the female bodyguard guards the wheat, even if she obeys the orders of the ant king, she shows protection for the weak. In Qi Yan's eyes, it seems like a beast-like, primitive act. Many pictures emphasize that the power and consciousness of protecting lovers are no different from those of beasts, and the so-called strength of human beings should be extended to a wider range of protection and compassion for the weak, rather than being limited to blood relatives like beasts, so, so In other words, does our human caring and helping the disadvantaged also come from our animal nature? If this is the case, then the failure of the chimeric ant is inevitable. Even if there is no "humanity" of the heir, the "bestiality" in its body will inevitably shake its will.
We are always accustomed to throwing the bad side of ourselves to the "bestiality", which is very harmful to the division of the source of inevitability. Foucault points the goal of genealogy directly to the authoritative source of necessity, which is a general category that encompasses all efforts to justify social behavior and customs from the perspective of priority origins. The fact that evolution from 'lower' animals undermines human dignity, Foucault said: "We hope with all our hearts to awaken man's sense of being the master of all things by showing man's divine origin; now the road is blocked, A monkey blocked the entrance." Therefore, when we have been unable or suffering from our own unsoundness, unable to admit our own unsoundness, we have metaphorically described it as "bestiality", and used the "scapegoat principle" to escape the right to wrong. face their own inadequacies. In fact, being aware of one's own insanity, or "sin", "is by no means the premise of falling into self-pity or making oneself an absolute law, but it often leads to genuine tenderness and kindness towards people or things." Xu Baogeng said that European literature can shine so brightly without the "original sin", that is, it is inseparable from the in-depth excavation of its own unsoundness.
View more about Hunter x Hunter reviews
