The above shows the personal position and the requirements for the basic elements such as the storyline of the film all the time. For this "magic masterpiece" of Disney's return to the theme of fairy tales, first affirm its visual effects. Besides, there are not many reasons to be particularly worth seeing. It's a rare time to return to the discussion of the storyline. I want to analyze these points that are worth "hesitating" before buying tickets.
Despite the gorgeous visual effects and many personal favorite Hollywood celebrities such as Anne Hathaway and Depp, this is still only a fairy tale. I also said fairy tales and fantasy forests in the Mermaid Film Review before, but the meaning is completely different. This "fairy tale" of Alice 2 can be directly understood as "low-child", because after tossing for a long time, you will find that this is a war caused by a cookie. It is true that a young fairy tale can still be a good film as long as its intention is high, reasonable, and profound...but unfortunately, this movie did not do it. The beginning part of the plot is really boring and yawning. When I thought it was a special effects blockbuster that instilled advanced thoughts on "anti-discrimination, protection of women's rights, and equality" in young girls, the narrative style of the story was open. A "moonbox"-style black box of time. Since then, a girl-to-young fairy tale braving pink bubbles has embarked on an embarrassing crossing route with a chaotic narrative and a sense of copycat. The nonsensical and embarrassing content reveals the truth of "cherish the moment and don't wait for the passage of time to regret", but is it worth taking the children to watch the movie? I choose say no. Yes, there are a lot of slots, and I am especially disgusted with this brutal act of forcing chicken soup, forcing a reunion, and even constantly anti-science in order to force posts.
1. From a scientific point of view, time is irreversible, and it is a taboo to go back to the past and change history in film and television works.
In the past few years, I don’t know whether it is a foreign infection at home or a domestic infection abroad, or the world’s great unity. Everyone is unavoidable. The theme of "crossing" is just like yours. To put it bluntly, most of them are still "thunder dramas" with both worrying quality and logic. However, time is one-dimensional, and it can only move forward irreversibly. As an old beauty, you don’t learn other project teams when Disney is shooting this kind of anti-scientific "fairy tale". You should learn more about science and technology and the West that you should be good at. philosophy?
Why can't it be traversed? Because fundamentally speaking, history cannot be changed, and crossing is almost certain to cause change. To give the simplest example, if a person travels to the past and tramples on an ant-this is a seemingly "trivial" incident-but this small incident is very likely to cause this ant's " From then on, the "family" will be extinct, and all the things related to it and the influence it caused will all be disrupted or even disappear in the course of history. This is the simplest case. That’s why it is said that the torrent of time is irreversible. If you can traverse, you change a person and you will change everything related to it; the disappearance of a person in the course of history will even lead to the demise of a country... so crossing will cause chaos in the world .
After explaining so many "scientific" truths, I believe someone will definitely object to "You are too serious, isn't this not making a movie, why not let fiction and hypothesis" and "Isn't there already so many cross-themes? There are even Successful sci-fi works, why are they so picky". So what I strongly oppose is to use "traversal" to change history. In your movie, Time warned so many times that it would cause chaos in the world and still failed to stop Alice from "destroying" the world and saving the second and middle-aged young man Mad Hatter, in exchange for the wonderful setting of a bowl of chicken soup, isn't it shameful? ? To the mainstream audience watching the movie: Is it really good for teenagers (adults with normal minds don't like watching this stuff) to do such a big mistake? Fairy tales never mean lawlessness. It is precisely because this subject matter targets movie fans that the worldview and philosophical ideas displayed by us adults are becoming more and more important to the future of this world. I personally think that film and television workers should be more cautious and respect science as much as possible.
2. Do not spoil such treasures as the "Moonlight Treasure Box" to complete an irresponsible "reunion"
There are two lines interspersed with the story full of troughs, one is Alice's crossing to save the Mad Hatter family. I really don’t want to show too much about Mad Hatter’s "Second Sickness" here. I can only say that as a captain Depp fan and Scissorhands Depp fan, I see that Uncle Depp is still playing such a role today. I am also very embarrassed. The protagonist Alice alone is not a likable character from the first episode. I don’t know if the "sentiment and righteousness" that arranged her to destroy the world at the expense of her second-second friend in 2nd year was the director's idea to instill in teenagers. If so, I can only shake my head and smile.
The other line of the Red Queen is even more irritating. It can be summarized in a simple sentence "I traveled to the past, alone and brave enough to destroy the world, just to ask you a sincere apology." Well, for so many years, the villain has been so arrogant and violent because when I was a child I was planted by my sister and ate a biscuit and didn't trust me. In addition, I was so angry that I was ridiculed by others and was deprived of the right to inherit the throne... …My God, Disney intends to use this idea to wash the villain’s "excusable feelings" and expose to the girls "Look, the white queen is such a green tea ×", and I just want to kneel for the director.
Who has never been wronged in life, how big is it to be an enemy of the whole world? The behavior of such a hostile little Taimei was actually whitewashed-although the white queen is hypocritical, the red queen is never worthy of liking: in my opinion, her lack of love can be said to be due to the deformity of the three views. The most unacceptable thing for me is that after the two irresponsible females tossed the world on these two lines, the director abruptly arranged an apology and a happy ending... for the sake of his own grievance and destruction. Oh My God was forgiven for such a big thing in the world! Director, I want to discuss life and the world with you. Is the existence of the Red Queen with low EQ and poor communication skills a king? As for the bowl of chicken soup that Alice got, the whole film looked as if MSG had been mixed with water, which was far-fetched to make people want to say.
Some people have gotten an inspiration that time is the most tolerant thing in the world, and they deeply agree with this. But don't forget, this kind of tolerance is more reflected in that it is fair to everyone. The mistakes made in the past, and the consequences they caused, are not cruel, but fairness and justice. Past injuries teach you to experience yourself as a better person. This is the tolerance and gift of time. Therefore, for the lawless Monkey King, we chose to make him lose the end of Zixia to become a classic even if there is an artifact like the Moonlight Treasure Box. Because this is life.
View more about Alice Through the Looking Glass reviews
