WHY BEING SO EMOTIONAL ???

Otto 2022-11-13 13:49:36

Why did they make this film in such an emotional way , if you want to talk about some big financial situation , want to talk about money , then the least you should do is to be rational and objective . When you are being emotional in these kind things , then it will no longer be convensing . And one more thing that this film did poorly is that it blames the wrong people . If you are making money , even a lot of money , in a legal way , then you shouldn't be blamed . But this films seems to be blaming those people who were making big moneys legally . As if the director is hating those people just because they have money . Such performance made this quite a shitty film .

The real cause of this finacial crysis is the capitalism itself, and if those capital counties are still running the economy worldwide, then this kind things will happen again.

But still , I can even say that in this film , those people who made it expect the American economy to get better , if those people who have money start to be kind , then it will just be a silly and unrealistic dream . Which in this case , I think this movie socks !!!

View more about Inside Job reviews

Extended Reading

Inside Job quotes

  • title card: The presidents of Harvard University and Columbia University refused to comment on academic conflicts of interest. - Both declined to be interviewed for this film.

  • interviewer: On your CV the title of this report has been changed from "Financial Stability in Iceland" to "Financial *In*stability in Iceland."

    Frederic Mishkin: Um, well, I don't know. Er, which, er whatever it is, is - the thing - if there's a typo, there's a typo.