1. I gave this show four stars. Four stars are awarded to the relatively rare subject of finance and law, as well as the actors' performances are not bad, and the one star deducted is the shortcomings of the script - the traces of the writing are too obvious, and it only touches on "inside information" "This is the most common and easy-to-understand crime, and I was expecting it to tell some dry stuff.
2. Talk about my views on the relationship between the male and female protagonists in the play. Sequence of characters I favor: Chuck, Lola, Akers, Wendy.
Many viewers don't like Chuck, probably because the actor is really ugly, and sometimes rambling, giving people the feeling of not being a big censor at all. Hmm, since the United States has produced a president like Trump who is not like a president, for the time being, I also accept that prosecutors are not necessarily like prosecutors. The reason I agree with him is still based on his unremitting crackdown on illegal behavior, although it has somewhat escalated into a personal grievance-style war of persecution.
Laura, I actually don't like this character very much, relying on my husband's resources to play the triad. However, if it is based on the husband and the child, it is understandable. It can be seen that Akers has reservations about her actions on her own. On the surface, he must support and praise, but from now on, some things will be concealed from her, so as to prevent her from acting again and self-defeating.
Akers. I hate this character a bit, but not as much as Chuck. Axe's getting rich is generally not out of the means and mentality of normal people, just as the first pot of gold for the vast majority of self-made rich people will not be very glorious. If they are severely criticized from a moral point of view, it is neither necessary nor useful. His most annoying moment was when he pointed at Wendy's phone in episode 12 and said, "I want to buy this, triple the price, or you'll ask for it." In fact, he should have shut up at this moment.
Wendy, this is a green tea bitch and I don't like her very much. Let's not talk about whether the fund managers really eat chicken soup or incentives (sorry, I always think chicken soup mentors in MLM organizations are the most powerful...), even if they do, when Vargas sits with her The opposite side repeatedly talked about the details of insulting prostitutes, and had to respond with a smile, which suddenly lowered the actual sense of value of this glamorous job.
But it's just a beautiful trash can. You have to listen to what the customer says is unpleasant.
I don't object to her staying in her husband's enemy's company for the purpose of making money, but what does it mean when she goes out of the bath naked and talks? Can Chuck agree? Although he knew it was impossible to have sex, did Akers agree to his wife getting naked and chatting with Chuck? The sauna's steam room is enough to avoid bugs. Even if I don't object, I'm drunk, maybe I should wear a swimsuit. In the end, it wasn't Axe's story, sarcasm that she went into the water without any objection, which is like a woman's demeanor.
This is also what I regret about this show: the woman sandwiched between the two opponents - a deliberately created contradictory character, no matter how she thinks it does not feel real.
View more about Billions reviews
