For example, the strikes in France, enjoyment, and the sluggishness of the European economy are very impressive. So the state pays huge amounts of money for this? Why is the expenditure of funds not in the lives of citizens, and where should the expenditure of funds be?
Many of these patients in the film think that Cuba is an evil country, but they did not expect that they can enjoy free medical care and solve problems that they cannot solve in the United States.
2. Many people say that this documentary is relatively one-sided and not objective enough;
I am wondering whether a documentary or a point of view must be comprehensive and objective in order to be acceptable or valuable. Is it wrong to deny a commentary point of view now in the name of not being objective enough?
Everyone expresses their views for the benefit of themselves or the group they represent. When someone agrees, there must be people on the other side who express opposing views. Understanding things comprehensively and objectively should be the job of the audience or decision-maker, not the one who makes the point.
During the reading of "Glory and Dreams" Roosevelt's New Deal, the most profound point was that the introduction of each policy was achieved after the compromise and balance of various groups and interests. Each group desperately expresses its own views and is only responsible for itself. In the end, the parties reach a balance and obtain a more satisfactory result.
You are only responsible for yourself, not for others, and the upper level or larger representative is responsible for balance and comprehensiveness.
View more about Sicko reviews
