I was very interested in this movie, but I never watched it. Yesterday I actually used my mobile phone twice - before going to bed - lethargic (no dreaming in between) - wake up and then read it. I don't know if this counts as a complete look. The scene and conception of the film are very imaginative, and the editing is also very clever. This reminds me of the connection between stunt and animation in sci-fi movies. I also compared its relationship with the scene of "Inception", and found that the means of realizing dreams through animation is more unified and vibrant than the real version of the movie. Does this confirm that painting constructs the relationship between our subconscious mind and the world? The techniques and methods here are just like Cai Kangyong's "The Way of Speaking", there are beautiful, impassioned, witty, humorous, but what can move us are all self and sincerity (just like the peasant brothers who have not spoken) short, sincere, unpretentious words on stage). The meaning of animation, or the painter's external connection to the world, is intertwined into dream and reality.
I am very concerned about the description of the virtual content in the "dream" behind the reality. This is a bit like netizens looking for the most familiar faces at the Spring Festival Gala over the years on the Internet, but to discover other unfamiliar content in their dreams. Is it the beginning of the so-called multi-linearity!
There is also a European and American movie in my memory. The movie (very early) is also about invading other people's dreams. I saw it when I was very young, and I am looking for it!
View more about
Paprika reviews
