Q: Don't you not comment on movies that are fast-forwarding all the way?
L: Yes, skipping over is equivalent to not watching it. Movies that have not been watched are not eligible to comment. Let's use it as an introduction and talk about something else.
Q: What is the reason for fast forwarding?
L: As far as the first six or seven minutes I watched at a normal speed, it was still an old problem with movies like Europe and the United States. At the beginning, I cleaned up some useless things, and there were no new tricks, so it was confusing and annoying.
Q: What is useful?
L: Start from meeting the old man, two or three sentences, and go straight to the gas station.
Q: I don't think the beginning should be too fast, it needs to create some atmosphere.
L: The key is to have conflict, suspense, and not dry the atmosphere. A woman drives a car, is she going to hit someone, be taken away by aliens, or is she going to fly up suddenly? ! Wait, there is too much suspense, but there is no suspense.
Q: You are sometimes too extreme. I think it may be that you watch too many movies...
L: Well, there are factors in this respect, but I don't think it's a problem. If a film didn't get five stars, there must be a reason for it, and I'll just say the reason I saw it. It's better than watching it, I can't tell you better. I've watched a lot of movies, and that's the benefit. My heart is full of good wine. If there is any problem with the wine in front of me, I can smell it.
Q: I agree or disagree with your judgment and put it aside. You can always come up with a judgment. Unlike me, after watching the film, I feel that there is something wrong with the film, but I can't explain it clearly.
L: I still don't see much.
Q: What do you want to talk about about this film?
L: Three o'clock. First, does the film subjectively instigate crime, in other words, does it magnify the pleasure of crime? If compared with ordinary crime films, the answer is undoubtedly yes, and the content that should be shown on the side is basically shown positively. Interestingly, in the crime scene, the film is constantly interspersed with expressions of someone's nervousness or pity. It can be seen that the main creator of the film is also putting out a little fire while setting fire. That's the power of censorship. Don't make value judgments on this, it's interesting to see such a typical example of censorship "participation" in creation so clearly and clearly.
Q: This is also the power of human nature! It was so dark that no one wanted to watch it.
L: It seems that we have differences in the human nature of good and evil. Don't say it, that's not the point. The second question, objectively, does this movie instigate crime? The answer is also yes, the mistakes made by the criminals in this film are obvious, and it is easy to draw lessons. If I were to shoot, I would not let this woman take revenge, I would let her sister do it, so that the biggest negative social impact of the film could be eliminated.
Q: What is the impact?
L: Your IQ needs to be improved. The third point is that the difference between good people and bad people is not whether they do bad things. Good people don't do bad things. It's just because there is a lack of reason, that's all.
Liu Qiang'ai's movie "I Spit on Your Grave", Episode 115: Seeing the Devil
View more about I Spit on Your Grave reviews
