1. It is said that children can learn 3 points from this film (HERE ARE 3 LESSONS KIDS WILL LEARN FROM THE GOOD DINOSAUR), one is facing fear, the other is friendship, and the third is self-discovery. When does Pixar's film need so much effort to find educational significance? Story is always the King, is it necessary to discover any educational significance for a story that cannot pick out a classic scene?
2. The failure of the film is that the protagonist, the dinosaur, does not have a clearly directed mission. On the surface, it is a scene of self-discovery (printing his own paw print on the granary). However, the father and son of the herbivorous dragon interact with human children. The coexistence, the encounter with the cowboy Tyrannosaurus, and the self-salvation through the pterosaurs. These few story segments did not closely serve this theme. The missionary conclusion of we are family is really lacking in Pixar’s tradition of using stories to shape the character. Logic. Structurally, you can vaguely see the shadow of "Finding Nemo", but Arnold's travel is really not smooth enough and does not have vivid characters/scenes suitable for children's cognition.
3. This film is made into a 7-minute short film, and it should have an endless aftertaste. What if people are not the primates of all things? Dinosaurs will also evolve into farming and animal husbandry, and there will be rules for the inheritance of civilization. Other creatures have respected dinosaurs as the ruler of the earth, so there will be "people" as pets on the stage of history. How will pet people and dinosaur owners interact? The ending doesn't have to fall on the clichéd Family, but you can try to turn into a dinosaur and then a pet, and a primate sapiens become a master. This kind of accidental arrangement of the inevitable biological chain may be more interesting, and it will be more interesting to find a bridge that has won the hearts of children.
4. The logic of the story is so twisted, the presentation of the scene is almost not interesting except for the technology. The scene of the father and son Liuying reveals a deliberate hypocrisy. The evolving barbarians actually have to teach the herbivorous dragon how to eat. Who is a pet? The divine beast's apocalypse and nonsense reveals a kind of unreliability. Tyrannosaurus Rex's Three Good Persons in the Wild was about to pose as a teacher to teach Arnold. Those hyenas and pterosaurs are too classical as masked villains. All in all, the whole film did not form a unified style. There seemed to be various tributes, but it couldn't string together a convincing story. Except for the slightly interesting scenes of farming at the beginning, the journey back home is simply useless. Personally, it is strongly not recommended for children to watch it-ps. It turns out that Pixar will also produce super bad movies, and it is said that this is because the minds of the chefs are elsewhere. Anyway, good children's films are indeed undesirable and convincing. the end...
View more about The Good Dinosaur reviews
