In the previous game, Soka complained that as a non-warlock, he was weaker than the other three warlocks. This is one of the most nonsense points in the previous game. The IQ of the previous supernatural power team is Soka. Without him and It would be troublesome without anyone else. Only by fighting fiercely can a powerful social system be considered a primitive society. The IQ of the supernatural power team is not Mami, who is a non-imperial master, or two people, Mami and Magao. It feels that Mami is in charge of mechanical technical support, and Margo is responsible for being cautious (Farik is responsible for saving the field. It's not as obvious as the previous work that IQ is tied to one person. Doesn't this mean that there is not such a big difference between everyone.
I think this may be a sequelae of watching superhero movies. I always wonder whether the opposition is established, where are the differences and where they are in common. Obviously, in the worldview of the superhero series, the imperial master cannot be compared with the heroes in the superhero movie worldview, because later The one is the so-called superhuman outsider, the former is not. Why do you have to distinguish the imperial magi? This distinction still marginalizes the imperial magi from the standpoint of the non-imperial magistrate. The imperial magistrate is me, and the imperial magi is the other. I can only think that this will make it impossible. The audience of Yushu has a sense of enthusiasm. Originally, there are differences between imperial and non-imperial skills, but differences do not mean that they have to be hostile. There are also differences between industrial civilization and agricultural civilization, and there are also differences between technology and non-technology. If you want to pursue equality, you can only have equal rights, because there is really no way. Eliminate all differences. But I really don't see any inequality in the rights of imperial masters and non-imperial masters in Republic City or anywhere. Indeed, if there is a difference, it may be turned into hostility. Without marginalizing an alien, there is no way to confirm one's rightful status, and people can only live like this. But if there is really a so-called power difference between the imperial master and the non-imperial master, it would be more logical for the latter to be marginalized into inferior by the former. It's just that this will not resonate with the audience. The antagonism between the two sides in the hero movie is because the hero is marginalized by ordinary people. Since the alien is alien, there is a reason to attack. Regardless of whether this alienation is established or not, it is obvious that the magician in the supernatural worldview is not a human Outsiders, is it so difficult to respect the setting? If you change the setting to the Royal Warlock, you are an outsider, and it will be no different from any other heroic movie.
(Speaking of respect setting, the second most nonsense of the previous game is Soka's persistent doubts about magical power.)
Tallock said that Amon may really think that imperial arts are the root of disaster. I think this idea is wrong. Obviously any power can be the root of disaster, such as Sato’s Gundam (wrong) technology, and any power can be any result. The root cause does not necessarily point to disaster, like the old example of using a knife to chop vegetables or using a knife to chop people. If any force is causing disaster, how can it be suppressed? Didn't it depend on strength, and Amon, who relies on blood to destroy others' imperial skills, shouldn't he know this best. If everyone has no power, will the world be peaceful? No, because any means that can achieve a certain purpose can be called power, the difference between imperial and non-imperial arts is gone (by abolishing all imperial arts), there is also the difference between technology and no technology, if you say Sato What should I do if my family intends to use Gundam to invade the world? Differences are still everywhere, but differences really do not necessarily mean hostility. Even hostility does not necessarily mean that one party wants to eliminate the other. S2 is not talking about the coexistence of light and darkness forever. There are so many differences between each person, but everyone has so much in common with each person. On the whole, can you say that they are the same or different? Why do we have to ask for one sentence to summarize the whole situation? Obviously, there is no way to summarize it out of context.
View more about The Legend of Korra reviews
