When the son became an adult, he finally knew that his biological father was a rich and powerful nobleman.
Is it common sense to contact him first to see if his father repents, suffers, whether he is willing to accept him, and give him compensation and care.
How could he kill his father without saying a word? Before China's liberation or three years of natural disasters, many families abandoned their children because of poverty. These children also try to find relatives when they grow up. I have never heard of revenge on my parents.
The biological mother is also weird. The two sisters were teased and abandoned by the deceased when they were young, but they are still willing to work as maids in the deceased's house for life.
The most outrageous thing is that as soon as the mother sees her son, she immediately believes that her son is the one to kill.
Mother and son never talked. Never met, never lived together. How can you guess that your son is here to kill? Can the mother figure out the psychology of the master who has lived for many years, and guess the psychological thoughts of the son in a dream?
Even if the mother guessed that the son wanted to kill, the normal reaction should be to talk to the son and persuade the son to give up killing, such as extorting the deceased together, which is more common sense. There are many solutions.
In order to prevent his son from committing a crime, he killed him first. How can there be such a mother's love?
If you really love children, you should try not to abandon them back then. If you really love children, you should hate the dead. But she served the deceased as a servant all her life.
So how absurd this logic and behavior pattern of mother and son is. Whether in China or in the UK, is there a realistic basis?
View more about Gosford Park reviews
