Seeing the one-sided affirmation and praise in the film review area, it is like the political stance in this movie, showing a standard eight-toothed smile, but carrying too much, makes the supposedly relaxed, happy, and warm Pixar become the current one. A copy of the serious look.
Looking back, why did Car1 succeed? We have seen the failure and success of an adolescent child, the care of the elders, and the beauty of friendship; we can also be nostalgic, but still look like childhood. Why did Car2 fail? Because he continued the laughter of 1, it is considered to have no connotation, but why can't the film critics see the bridge to pay tribute to 007, and why can't Dian Ya be the protagonist? In fact, these are not important, the important thing is that my children can understand and gain the power of happiness from it.
Yet amid the critique, Pixar finally produced this freak, and I could even see Pixar in decline from this film. Is the theme for Car3 correct? Correct, funny? Not funny, easy? Not easy, the key is his audience, who is this movie made for? In order to highlight the theme of political correctness, Pixar has sacrificed too much. Car3 is very like Hillary Clinton, who was soaring in the past. What awaits her is only the polarized trial of film reviews and box office.
At the end of the day, animation is animation.
View more about Cars 3 reviews
