Generally speaking, "Rio 2" is very noisy. From the beginning to the end, it is full of climaxes, but there is no climax. I wanted to relax, but I was even more tired after watching it.
I don't remember the plot after reading it, I just remember that the male and female protagonists had completely different consciousnesses. They finally experienced struggles, finally resolved for love, and lived happily together again.
I want to say that such a plot can only exist in fairy tales! How can two people with different views live happily together? If you ask a marriage counselor, most of them have to advise them to divorce. The male protagonist is named Blue, and the female protagonist is named Pearl. Blue likes the human way of life in the city, baking pancakes, watching football games, human beings are masters and family members, while Pearl likes the wild way of life in nature, living in caves, living in caves, and having family members. Living in groups and jointly resisting the attacks of other species, humans are outsiders and enemies. It's a complete ideological difference, if these two birds didn't meet under the special circumstances of the first episode - there are only two macaws left in the world, but they are placed in a pile of macaws, Neither of them must look down on the other, because after all, the difference in consciousness between the two is too great, so why can they be attracted to each other?
However, they did get married, because fate is sometimes bestowed by God. Not every couple in this world is a perfect match, and most of them live together. Whether they are in love or not is another matter, but fairy tales have begun to sing the hymn of "love can conquer together".
It is true that love can conquer together. But what is love for? To live a life you don't want? In order to let the person he loves live a life he doesn't want? The difference between Bruce and Pearl is not that I want to buy a Japanese car, you want to buy a German car; I want to eat hot pot, you want to eat French food; I want to have a dog, you want to have a cat; I want to watch Korean dramas, it's as simple as you want to watch football. The differences between the two are directly related to the principle of survival, pursuit of life, and attitude to life. If a person compromises or changes on these principles, do you still say he is still him?
When I saw the lonely appearance of Bruce following his father-in-law in the forest, bumping into walls everywhere, I thought of his relaxed and happy elegance in the city. If I were Pearl, who loved him dearly, I couldn't ask him to stay in an environment he didn't like and he couldn't adapt, and I couldn't allow him to go from a charismatic gentleman to a downcast loser. On the contrary, if I were Bru, I would not be able to forget the gleaming light in Pearl's eyes when she returned to the forest, and the daily satisfaction and happiness she revels in the depths of the forest, which only selfish people can force Pearl goes from a happy forest elf to a lifeless city housewife.
You might say that love is a responsibility, and life is about constant choices and compromises. If so, please don't say "love can conquer everything", you should say "responsibility can conquer all" and "life can conquer together". If love has so many additional conditions and the shackles of conquering everything on its back, can it still be called love?
But what about fairy tales, if they are incomplete, how can they be called fairy tales? "Love can overcome together", it's still pretty good.
View more about Rio 2 reviews
