=================Dark dividing line
======================================================================== The movie is actually a game, and the director has done it very successfully.
After watching the film, some economists were indignant at the hypocrisy of women, and if Mohammed, the terrorist, murdered his two children in front of his face, he would definitely say that there is another nuclear bomb. As a result, the woman's kindness, in turn, accused the interrogator who had just killed Muhammad's wife, "You are not a human, you are a beast", which led to the final nuclear bomb explosion and a basket of water. In the face of the life and death of tens of millions of people, what is the child of two terrorists? Torture the girls as much as you like, and the torturers not only don't have to bear any morals, but are noble - become the unsung heroes who save thousands of lives.
There are also some small and fresh, can't bear to see the innocent suffer: 10 million innocent people died, and the terrorist's wife and children did not commit a crime, why should they die, and it is very likely that they were tortured to death by perverts? In order to save 10 million people, cruelly torturing one or two other innocents is moral annihilation?
...
I guess the director must have laughed when he saw this, the game was a success, and he made fun of this person who thinks he is smart or noble. Who created this interrogation environment? What is it to keep running for? In the film, the bald old man with very few scenes and a lot of power can make it clear: how can swollen promise to change our country's Arab foreign policy for a century for a terrorist? ! The old shit doesn't agree either! ! The old paper wants the coordinates of the bomb! ! ! While telling everyone about this ultimate goal, Director Qiao painstakingly created such a tangled and cruel interrogation room situation to lead everyone into a ditch, so in the end he succeeded - no one noticed how absurd this ultimate goal was, and everyone was exhausted. Thinking about how to pry open Muhammad's iron mouth to get the coordinates of the bomb, or pay sympathetically to pay attention to how cruel, bloody and anti-human this process of prying is.
Since the director is proud of "given a rule of the game, the weak audience will accept my worldview without hesitation", I am very interested in playing with the rules - for example, ①Since the policy can't be changed, why can't it be Let Swollen first give a speech pretending to promulgate a new policy for Muhammad to see, and then immediately announce the withdrawal in private? It turned out to be because the big country couldn't afford to hurt the face. So ② is face more important or human life more important?
When asked this way, the rules fall into an infinite loop. I had to summon the darkest of several split personalities and play the role of Muhammad to continue the game with everyone. You must know that information asymmetry is the key to winning or losing here. I have four nuclear bombs that I don’t know where to hide as trump cards, and the special team has access to outside information to enter the interrogation room. Since I am a dark and mischievous Muhammad, I have to assume that the old and the young are all dead. Then:
Play the first card - it turns out that your century-old foreign policy is so important, it's funny~ Then let me watch the TV report of your heroic secret service team rushing into the "pagan temple" on the soil of the country Let's kill. Of course, technology is so advanced now that TV reports can be faked. If you are not stupid, you should understand that I am giving away this card for free, I just want to tell you, "In order to make the game more fun, I don't care about the bottom line. ";
followed by the second one - the price is that I will choose one of you, accept the same torture as me, and then put it to death. How swollen, your bottom line is beginning to shake, right?
And the third one - since there are so many people who are full of righteous indignation and hope that my wife and children will just poop soon, let's get 10 innocent people in and copy what just happened to me. Let's have fun, the boundaries of the game expand from the interrogation room to the real world outside, and these people with high morals must be willing to sacrifice themselves and their families for the lives of tens of millions of people outside. And the bad thing is, the good people of the secret service team, you have to kill a limited number of good people in order to save many good people, isn't it more tangled?
As for the last one, are you willing to believe it? If you believe me, take me to the garage where you just took out the third bomb. Let's blast me and the garage with a missile that can pierce the ground. I have already buried the bomb in the deep concrete. But to take care of your emotional structure, the design is very fragile. One shot can blow up the entire foundation. The ground-penetrating missile can definitely handle it. Of course, you can also choose not to believe it, because it's crazy to put missiles on your own territory - when there are only ten seconds left, I will tell you where the nuclear bombs that are not buried in the ground are actually hidden. ...... The game is fun to play like this, but unfortunately, in order to avoid falling into such darkness, most people would rather choose to calculate the dilemma between economics and morality under an absurd rule
.
Even that rule is not so absurd, it has many names: reality, law, axiom, fate - people simply can't choose to get rid of it, so the collective perversion suffers from Stockholm Syndrome.
View more about Unthinkable reviews
