For Tarkovsky's film, some Douyou commented - "The camera is so slow, so beautiful, so poetic, so hypnotic." Slow is probably the synaesthesia of audiences accustomed to fast-paced movies in the 21st century. Beautiful and poetic, it is appropriate to describe the opening and ending. Hypnosis, well, yes, it's best to watch right before bed. For decades, movies related to the stars and the sea have been more or less influenced by Kubrick's "2001 A Space Odyssey". In preparation for the filming of "Fly to Space," Tarkovsky was invited to see it as well. Tarkovsky, who doesn't like science fiction at all, is very disgusted with the technological and futuristic images presented by Kubrick. He stubbornly insists on himself while compromising with the original author Lem, which makes us see a space station that is half neat, half scribbled, half surreal, half primitive. Frankly, I don't really like it. However, the beginning and end of the film are wet, sticky and slippery, full of nostalgia and love. For those who have read the original book, it can be said that it corresponds to the end of the novel, and Solaris has created another cruel miracle; for those who have not read the original book, it can be said that the whole story "doesn't exist", and Solaris is just torture. props of the self. OK.
View more about Solaris reviews
