Let's talk about the advantages
A novel view of alien life. The sea could not communicate at first. When scientists studied it with rays, it learned this communication method, so it also released the ability to scientists, and this ability is the image of the person who makes the deepest or most guilt or favorite person in human memory. It is embodied, and the embodied person also has the same memory as the subject.
The content of the object simulation : - Common memory, extracted from the memory shared with the subject, will slowly emerge - Personality, extracted from the subject's memory of ta's personality - Emotion, according to the manifestation of ta's personality in the subject's memory
But if it stops at the second, it is just a clone of memory, and the object has other properties : - Learning ability similar to human. Learning how to be with the subject, learning how to sleep - the development of independent self-awareness. Harrie finally realizes that he is not the original Harrie, but an independent individual with his own new thinking and thoughts - the object only appears when the subject is awake (suspected, the protagonist only has Harri's clothes on the bed when he sleeps, and he wants to wake up When he came, harri suddenly appeared beside him and fell asleep)
What exactly is the object I deduced : - The object is the body that the sea reconstructs with neutrinos according to the structure of human beings, including the structure of the brain and the structure of various organs. There is no difference in function between the object brain and the human brain, and the same memory is embedded in the object's brain.
communication
I don't agree with other film critics saying that the object is only there for counter-attack or revenge. On the contrary, the appearance of the object is just a response of the sea to the signal sent by human beings. If you give me a signal, then I will also give you a signal. For Hai, there is no distinction between hostility and hostility. It's like spitting at a baby. The baby thinks it's a way to communicate, so he responds with spit. It can be spit or handshake. It's a kind of communication, depending on the meaning given to it by others.
And what communication and communication are, are the tools and methods to understand the meaning of the other party. Through this object-creating response, Hai has a preliminary understanding of what its ability can do to human beings. Some people are addicted to this kind of object, while some people reject the object, and some people self-destruct because of the object. These different endings are new to Hai and have no precise meaning. And I suspect that the sea can expand the scope of this kind of object according to the intensity of people's obsession, and the ending of the film is exactly this embodiment.
The extension of the final object: - the object extends to an area of life, an island
In simple terms, the ability of the sea can construct objects within a certain framework, including intelligent life. This framework is a person's brain or memory, it cannot create things out of thin air.
Discussion on the space station
I don't think there are so many things worth discussing, just the following points: - Whether the object person can also be counted as a subject, this is the category of universal morality. Is it possible to treat objects like guinea pigs? The choice of the protagonist is NO. -Whether accepting objects and having an emotional life with them is irresponsible for scientific work, this is the category of work ethics. Similar to whether a doctor can fall in love with a patient. The choice of the protagonist is possible. - Exploration and love can only choose one, which is which. To study the object often leads to destruction and cruelty; to choose love, to abandon science and knowledge. In my opinion, this is a false proposition. The inability to conduct non-destructive research can only show the limitations of research, not that research will inevitably account for the opposite of love.
I don't think the other discussion content should be discussed in the movie: -Is the cognition of unknown life too limited. When we realize this, we have actually broken through the limitations, just as we have actually started to introspect when we are discussing whether we should introspect. - Humans don't know enough about themselves, and exploring the outside world will only cause pain. This is as if we are willing to be the frog in the well without suffering. No matter what we choose, human beings will suffer, and suffering itself is a combination of curse and blessing. This question is just an ostrich whine, not worth discussing. - About unraveling the mysteries of the universe. The novel emphasizes that human beings can only accept the idealized world of human beings. The film emphasizes that human beings only want to extend the earth to the universe and need mirrors. I feel like you're drinking coffee, and the writer and director insisted you eat a dry wowtou. If the real scientists were like the movies, it would be 100 years before we landed on the moon, because they kept talking about "going to the moon is just to extend the earth to the moon" or "going to the moon is just to go to the moon." It is to find a mirror for human beings, and human beings can also learn how to look at themselves on the earth.” As for the orbit of the moon? Who cares.
In short, the content of the space station is like a few philosophers holding a reading meeting, and it is the kind of waiting for half a minute.
About the ending
At the end of the film, the protagonist gave up his research and immersed himself in the object world. In this world, he reconciled with his father. Although the world is not perfect, there is still hot water in the house, but it can be improved. The father has appeared, and he will appear again. what is impossible for harrie?
Summarize
A philosophical literature with a sci-fi shell was filmed by a director who was good at making philosophy films, and the result was like this, with lengthy long shots, procrastinating rhythms, expressionless protagonists, and a two-minute slow philosophical discussion.
If the film is compressed from 170 minutes to 100 minutes, 40 minutes of foreshadowing are cut, and a male protagonist with better acting skills is replaced, and the philosophical discussion is more combined with the example of solaris and more passionate, then maybe it can be regarded as a good film.
View more about Solaris reviews
