There are many shady displays in the film. For example, the warden has caused the death of the prisoner many times without consequences, such as the spread of "assassination", for example, the warden has been investigated three times but not guilty three times. If the general wants to go out, he can easily let him out and so on. It was really black that he couldn't see his fingers, and felt a deep chill.
Regarding the final plan, I think the general miscalculated. The general and his party chose to seize the prison and forced the warden to resign. Although the ultimate goal must be achieved, it took the life of the general. I think there are two points for the general's miscalculation. One point is that the flag is not raised quickly enough and there is time for assembly. It is better to raise the flag earlier and let the one-star officer find out. The second point is the misjudgment of the warden, but this is also true. What puzzled me was that the general knew that the warden was a narrow-minded person and valued fame and fortune (you can see from the collection in the room). The general himself threatened the warden’s two points. Wouldn’t you think it might be forced? Will the warden jump the wall in a hurry? I am more puzzled about this. The general himself also wants to be released from prison with his family, just for dignity. He wants to punish himself here. If he loses his life early, isn't it worth the loss? This is what I didn't understand.
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------split line-------------------------------- -------------------------------------
After reading some film reviews of others, I feel that one of them speaks the feeling that I can't express in my heart. That is, the "dignity" of the soldiers is too much, the reaction is too easy, and it is even more suspect that the reason for the success is to serve the purpose of the film, but it ignores the feasibility and rationality. Hmm, change the score~
View more about The Last Castle reviews