Well-planned, ruthless hunters, intelligent, ruthless, and powerful anti-hunters stage a hearty hunting battle. The level of action scenes with a small amount of suspense elements is excellent. It is performed by such an image and temperament heroine. Every time she has a neat trick to kill, it can make people's adrenalin soar. The female version of Jason Statham is very similar from the expression in his eyes to the fierceness of his skills. It is time for Hollywood to have a few new female stars. The weak and pretty girls are always forced to fight back. Routines can be changed.
It triggers thinking at the level of political positions. I think that the director of this film did not have such high demands. His original intention was to label the pros and cons, create a point of departure for a slightly deeper conflict, and then add some reversal to the audience: Oh, it turns out It's not as simple as the slaughtering of diaosi by wealthy elites who are idle and uncomfortable! As for the setting of the original sin of both parties, in the United States, American society can be divided into dual classes and sublimated: the commoners reflect on their own cleanliness, and the elites are a little bit outspoken in fear. I think it is a bit over-interpreted. Trump somehow jumped out of the wrong way and became a propagandist for the film.
Was the heroine caught by the hunter by mistake? Athena's entanglement with this is just to prove that their judgment on the bottom rednecks and trolls is correct, and the hunting action is extremely just. Was the heroine really caught by mistake, or did she deliberately say that, she dropped her position and attacked the arrogance of these elites? Keeping this doubt can improve the tone of the film, which is right or wrong? Nothing but nothing.
Weaknesses: In the end, the duel with Swank's twin girls took a little longer, the scene was smaller, and the duel method was simpler, which lowered the foreshadowing ahead. It should be a mobile battle inside and outside the manor. The deep meaning of class struggle, while picking up all kinds of guys, using all kinds of manor rich equipment to kill each other. The luxury that is supposed to serve the enjoyment of life becomes a tool to destroy life at the same time as brand interpretation. It is more enjoyable and reflects the sharpness of class struggle!
There is also a train escape to the military camp that is a bit out of place. The situation under the control of the hunter is chaotic, whether it is strong or weak, out of control and undercover preparations at the same time, so the conflicting plot is not very good.
Small BUG: I don’t think anyone has mentioned it yet: How did the heroine open the bit, and did she practice bone-shrinking exercises in Afghanistan?
View more about The Hunt reviews
