I don't think this is a qualified documentary. It is true that the photographer lived in a waste car factory and collected materials for so many years, but what I want to see is an objective and rational analysis of an "unjust case" without emotional factors. Therefore, to me: the empty footage taken near the junkyard, several girlfriends of SA who have nothing to do with the case, the TV reports of the year, the interviews of passers-by on the jury, these are all worthless waste materials, and refuse to be stuffed with these materials , I skip all these, for fear of being misled, and I don't want to waste time. "For two and a half years, the two directors have been living in the small town where Steven Avery's house is located, and the empty mirrors of the snowy sky in the camera are also their daily life."
I don't understand the American judicial system, but after watching so many crime dramas such as "HTGAWM", as well as some other popular sciences, I understand that a lawsuit is a battle of wits, it depends on lawyers, and it doesn't care about justice and facts at all.
Before watching this drama, I just read the title and thought it was a natural pervert/serial murderer like "Mindhunter". It is disappointing to see that it is about "unjust case" and that it has not been "debated" for more than 30 years. Especially in recent years, I have seen many Netflix dramas/movies with worrying quality, and I am even more worried...
I am not shocked or angry at these operations, because I have seen even more. "Liar" and "American Vandal" can actually have more impact than this real documentary. You can see how important it is to direct and edit well
From my point of view, the context of the incident is so simple, the 18 years of unjust imprisonment is indeed unjust, and the evidence is abundant. This part of the play is not biased and very clear. But when it comes to the murder case in the back, it becomes very oriented, which induces the audience to subjectively think that SA was framed and framed. After reading it, I have long understood that we simply cannot restore the truth of the facts by relying on oral dictation and court hearings. I feel more and more that the truth is not important, and the final outcome of SA is not important either. Even if the final result of the season is that SA was wronged and was compensated for 38 million US dollars, and the involved was dismissed and compensated, such a result would not be [pleasant]. I would even think that the family simply cut off contact with SA, and that only one person was destroyed. Maybe some people temporarily benefited from the law and some people were temporarily sad, but it took more than 20 years to destroy countless people. If it is so difficult to reveal the truth, why not stop it?
I also sighed how important eugenics is. According to the reality of the drama, the 16-year-old nephew obviously has intellectual problems. SA is a consanguineous marriage? IQ is only 70. And at the beginning, stealing and burning cats were not a good bird, and common sense reasoning did not apply to him. It is entirely possible that he thought he had been wrongly imprisoned, and now he is a "star" who has been sent gold water. Identity, even if he commits a crime, he can insist that he is wronged, and it is entirely possible to leave the victim's car in his own yard with a very low IQ.
More emotionally, "Poor people lose. Poor people lose all the time." --- Steven Avery
"Poor people lose all the time."
"The one-sided narrative method is far inferior to Serial. It is worse than the bizarre story. Many editing are too tricky, but considering that it was disliked by all TV stations and even HBO at the beginning, it is understandable that many breaking the logical order is to sell well. "
"Excluding the gender language/TV style comparison, the rise of the certain type documentary, the loopholes in the judicial system, the prying of human nature and other professional issues, the New York Disaster Star and this documentary all tell the ordinary you: poverty and stupidity will ruin your life. Avery, who has an IQ of only 70, has learned a lesson in eighteen years: "The poor lose, and the poor always lose. "30 years in prison."
I won't chase after the second season, I hate people quibbling!
Personal complaints record, do not want to spark discussion, do not spray.
View more about Making a Murderer reviews
