The biggest advantage of the film should be that most of the shots are still relatively realistic. For example, through surveillance video to show the character's activities, most of the scenes are simulated prisons and laboratories. The character characteristics of several main characters are also portrayed relatively clearly. Among the prisoners, there is always a person who is more active, clever, and pushy, but it hurts everyone to be punished. This type of person is usually suitable for being a leader, with strong calling ability and commendable courage in doing things, but sometimes lack of wisdom. At the same time, among the prisoners, there is also a type of people who are submissive and keep a low profile. On the surface, they obey orders, but in fact, they are clear about everything and characters in their hearts. In contrast, "leaders", such people are equivalent to military advisers. At the same time, the dark side of human nature is really unfathomable. I still don't understand, why did the prison guards go to this level? At the beginning, with human civilization, gradually, it became an irrational beast. Trampling the dignity of others, taking the initiative through violence, and even hurting former partners, human nature has been wiped out little by little. The prison guards are no longer human, but animals with sticks in their hands. And it is quite surprising that an experiment with so many people involved is only controlled by three people behind the scenes? Maybe the professor is still too optimistic. He really thinks he is so powerful. The advice of others, don't be clever but be mistaken by wisdom, and lose your life as a result.
However, some of the plots of the film seem to be unnaturally connected, and the background introduction of the characters is a bit simple. For example, the appearance of the woman in the film makes me feel a bit baffled. It seems that the two fell in love with each other after a one-night stand. However, I feel that such a love also fits the storyline too much. It seems to be a bit inconsistent with common sense. At the last critical moment, he also shot to save the hero. In addition, the true identity of the male protagonist is still quite vague, probably because the focus of the film is not on this. However, I think the director should still explain clearly, because later he felt that he should be regarded as an undercover character. It seems that he did not perform the task well, yes, maybe his intuition thinks that there is something wrong with this experiment, but the real exposure is because of the murder, the whole situation of the experiment is out of control before people know it, and he himself Almost became a victim. Of course, the final ending of the film is indeed quite tragic, as if the whole incident has been reduced to a killing battlefield, it depends on whether innocent people can successfully escape. Subconsciously, everyone may have violent impulses. Fortunately, we rational people still have consciousness to control the psychological activities of the subconscious, but in such an almost completely closed environment, the good part of the consciousness has been completely swallowed up by anger. In fact, the whole conflict seems to be It's just a quarrel between the prison guard and the prisoner. Of course, there may be personal insults, maybe violence caused by anger, and then the pleasure of deliberately bullying a person, and then all kinds of revenge and fights. I have to say that after watching this film, my mood is really heavy, and I still feel depressed during the process of watching it. However, it is a psychological movie that can trigger a lot of thinking.
View more about The Experiment reviews
