I've been wondering why humans are overly addicted. It seems that the root of all human conflict and violence is that people keep forgetting that original positions are decided by lottery.
If everything starts with a blank, human nature is blank, then forgetting this, to advertise what to maintain the so-called order is itself a kind of loss. The result was just a disaster.
On the contrary, except for the excessively lost, the male protagonist keeps saying that this is just a game, and that his extra perspective brings external force to the experiment.
I can feel where the major's disapproval of him comes from. Although it is a game, the rules of the game are serious, just like the rules in life. Otherwise, everyone will be drunk and I will wake up alone, and will only lead the disaster to myself.
Most admire the attitude of the Major. The male protagonist in the middle asked the major what your mission was. I don't know why I was so impressed by this small talk. He said:
Observe, report, and stay awake.
It can also make a difference at a critical moment.
In general, there are too many things that are unreasonable in the design and operation of this experiment. If the experimental subjects found are like Bash Bears, maybe nothing will happen. But experimental designers themselves have a tendency to anticipate out-of-control events and allow danger to occur.
The results were remarkable, and the results were disastrous.
In the end, it still points to the justice of Rawls' "veil of ignorance". The game position is decided by lottery, but in real life, what do we decide by ourselves?
View more about The Experiment reviews
