Originally, I didn’t criticize bad films, but this time I felt that I was not fooled by the director, but by the audience. The IMDB rating of this film was actually 7 points (now it’s 6.6 points), and a lot of comments praised it. How oppressive the film is, how terrifying it is, how it plays with the audience, and how it contemplates human violence. . . . . Wait,
I can only say that this film is really mentally retarded. It is said that it is about exploring human nature and violent audiences. Have they received too much moral education since childhood? Where do you need to see something great? According to this logic, there is no bad film in the world. You can say any bad film, and I can analyze it for you. Even after the analysis, you start to doubt whether you are mentally retarded, and you don’t see him. It is so great indeed.
This film can only be said that the director can't figure it out. If he just made it into a film, there is no gimmick. He directly talks about two perverted killers playing their family to death. I also respect him for being a man, and he has to use the whole remote control. I have to talk to the audience and the two SB protagonists are still talking about quantum physics on board. . . . . This is the director's fear that it is really empty and empty, and he came up with it to fool the audience.
Rewinding this clip, I think it is to learn the "click" magic remote control. Of course, it is far less than the film's full play, so extreme, so healthy and educational significance.
As for the conversation with the audience, these things are not new, and the play is really bad, raping the audience and reflecting on the violence? Or watch "Man Bite Dog", A Clockwork Orange and so on. . . This piece is definitely a fake B, not a real B.
The biggest problem with this film is that, like our great "Promise", he is mentally retarded in all aspects, and uses his mental retardation to explain and promote the development of the plot. . . . .
View more about Funny Games reviews
