To pursue and kill for the sake of killing, violence to continue life is not advisable

Adelle 2022-04-22 07:01:32

At the beginning of the movie, the big boss scientist is also a serious businessman, honestly helping the protagonist to continue his life, without any money from the black protagonist, abiding by his promise, and treating the daughter of Qian Dabing. The scientist occupied the body of his assistant in time, and he did not forget his wife. He often visited her. If her wife was not suffering from Alzheimer's disease, she would even help her survive. There are various indications that the villain of this film is not a wicked person, or even a bit human, and the film of occupying the body does not explain whether he is forcibly occupying, maybe someone voluntarily sacrificed himself?
On the other hand, the male protagonist, as a real estate tycoon, dare to say that he did not exploit the hard-earned money of ordinary people to start his life? No profiteer, no businessman, don’t disguise propaganda of the philanthropy of capitalism. Well, as such a big capitalist, he actually ignores his own interests and helps a mother and daughter who have every relationship, and there is no benefit at all. It is unreasonable to think?
Some people say that the male protagonist occupies the body of the soldier and is influenced by the soldier's thoughts. It is a great conscience and noble moralism to protect the mother and daughter.
Then I don't understand why the male protagonist can kill the doctor and the thugs without blinking an eye, and feel all kinds of guilt for an irrelevant mother and daughter and the soldier who occupies the body. This is a typical role-building problem. In Tianya's words, it is Double standard bitch. And the doctor is not a bad guy in the full sense, just a typical mad scientist. His life extension was approved by others, and the thugs fought back because the hero shot and resisted, and I don't know why they wanted to kill him.
Are all beings equal? Do you dare to learn from Lord Batman not to kill people? Or if you want to kill people, then you should be more down-to-earth, act selfishly, and be as down-to-earth as Deadpool. It is obvious that the screenwriter is too lazy to think about logic, and directly creates an excuse so that the next chase plot can develop smoothly, and chases for the sake of chase, regardless of the inner changes of the characters.
As for the positioning of this film, it was originally a big-scene action suspense film. You can see the car chase, the chase, and the shootout. Unfortunately, the director's filming is bad. Compared with the scene where the American team 3 chases and kills the Winter Soldier next door, I don't know. Where did it go. If you want to forcefully say that it is a literary suspense film, then at least give it a reversal. I don’t say Hemulland Road, her, even if it is a small-cost film such as Lobster and Heart Labyrinth, you at least give it a reversal to let the audience Guess it, this film is basically a flat and straightforward narrative, and it is not literary at all.
In the end, I don't understand why the ending skips the male protagonist's struggle to give up his body, and directly flashbacks the results. The bright spot in people's hearts is all in the wonderful performance of Deng Chao's execution. This kind of painful struggle is very good The test of acting skills also shocked the audience deeply, but he actually gave up and gave a non-painful video commentary, and the eggs were broken.

View more about Self/less reviews

Extended Reading

Self/less quotes

  • Albright: Without me your mind will relapse. And we both know who takes over.I'm the only one standing between you and oblivion.

  • Young Damian: [opening his eyes for the first time] It didn't work.