The plot is indeed rather far-fetched. If you put aside the benchmark of morality and ethics, this ending can be said to be a bad ending. The whole film can also be summarized as Damian made a choice between taking away the private property of others and giving up the competition, but this private property is extremely important to a person's life memory and will. It's hard not to imagine a day when life science and technology will develop to that day, when the most important thing may no longer be the deposit in the bank, but the existence of the individual. But if it comes to morality, this technology will undoubtedly set off a large-scale panic. For wealthy businessmen, "depriving" other people's property itself is part of the value of existence, so setting this subject as a businessman is somewhat contrasting with its final choice. . And if life is reduced to just a skin, the value of life tends to be zero. From this point of view, I am disappointed that Damian has lived under a strange skin for a few months, which is more important than experiencing cancer. Many experienced a process of resisting drugs, and eventually his will was eliminated. Sadly, he died invisible and without a carrier. It is equivalent to voluntarily giving up "private property", the spirit is lamentable, and the businessman has become a philanthropist.
(There is more personal will, so it does not seem to be in the moral mainstream, but after talking, at least we may not have such treatment in this era, right?)
View more about
Self/less reviews